Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:21:08.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards Model-based Process Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The high interaction between process and product models in product development and systems engineering (SE) is common sense. However, most research in the field of model based systems engineering (MBSE) focusses of physical systems (hardware and software). The authors claim that this focus is a main reason for the low acceptance and high effort for implementation of SE and MBSE in industrial practice. Thus, this contribution aims at supporting an integrative analysis and synthesis of process and product models by introducing the concept and framework of Model-based Process Engineering. Based on established research this framework introduces three main systems, namely the system of processes, system of product models, and system of tools to describe complex product development. The main contribution of this work is a preliminary concept to structure and link the systems of processes and product models. Besides form the description of the main relations between the systems an integrated modelling concept to represent links between the process and product model system is proposed.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Albers, A. and Braun, A.C. (2011), “A generalised framework to compass and to support complex product engineering processes External Link”, Int. Journal of Product Development, Vol. 15 No. 1-3, pp. 625. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2011.043659Google Scholar
Albers, A. and Muschik, S. (2010), “Development of Systems of Objectives in Early Activities of Product Development Processes”, Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering (TMCE 2010).Google Scholar
Browning, T.R., Fricke, E. and Negele, H. (2006), “Key Concepts in Modeling Product Development Processes”, Systems Engineering, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 104128. http://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20047Google Scholar
Browning, T.R. and Ramasesh, R.V. (2007), “A survey of activity network-based process models for managing product development projects”, Production and Operations Management, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 217240. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00177.xGoogle Scholar
Chucholowski, N. and Lindemann, U. (2015), “An Initial Metamodel to Evaluate Potentials for Graphbased Analyses of Product Development Projects”, Proceedings of the 17the International Dependency and Structure Modelling Conference, DSM 2015.Google Scholar
Danilovic, M. and Browning, T.R. (2007), “Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices”“, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 300314. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.003Google Scholar
Dori, D. (2002), Object-Process Methodology: a holistic systems paradigm, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Eckert, C.M., Wynn, D.C., Maier, J.F., Albers, A., Bursac, N., Xin Chen, H.L., Clarkson, P.J., Gericke, K., Gladysz, B. and Shapiro, D. (2017), “On the integration of product and process models in engineering design”, Design Science, Vol. 3 No. 3, http://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.2Google Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K. and Meerkamm, H. (Eds.) (2013), Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Denkabläufe, Methoden-einsatz, Zusammenarbeit, Hanser eLibrary, 5, Auflage, Hanser, München.Google Scholar
Estefan, J.A. (2008), Survey of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Methodologies, RevB, California, USA.Google Scholar
Franke, H.J. (1976), Untersuchungen zur Algorithmisierbarkeit des Konstruktionsprozesses, PhD-Thesis, TU Braunschweig.Google Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Dumitrescu, R., Steffen, D., Czaja, A., Wiederkehr, O. and Tschirner, C. (2015), Systems Engineering in Industrial Practice, Paderborn, Germany.Google Scholar
Huth, T., Inkermann, D., Wilms, R. and Vietor, T. (2018), “Towards Model-based Process Engineering An approach to integrated product system and process modelling”, Proceedings of EMEASEC 2018 / TdSE 2018, Berlin.Google Scholar
Huldt, T. and Stenius, I. (2018), “State-of-practice survey of model-based systems engineering”, Systems Engineering, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 134145. http://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21466Google Scholar
ISO/PAS19450 (2015), Automation systems and integration-object process methodology, International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
Kaffenberger, R., Schulze, S.O. and Weber, H. (2013), INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook, Carl Hanser Verlag, München.Google Scholar
Kasser, J. (2010), “Seven systems engineering myths and the corresponding realities”, Proceedings of the Systems Engineering Test and Evaluation Conference, Adelaide, Australia, May 3, 2010, pp. 113.Google Scholar
Martin, J.N. (1996), Systems Engineering Guidebook: A Process for Developing Systems and Products, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
Negele, H., Fricke, E. and Igenbergs, E. (1997), “ZOPH—a systemic approach to the modeling of product development systems”, Proceedings of 7th Annual Symposium of INCOSE, Los Angeles, pp. 773780.Google Scholar
OMG (2011), Business Process Model and Notation™ (BPMN™) Version 2.0. [online] Available at: http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/Google Scholar
Ropohl, G. (1974), Systemtechnik - Grundlagen und Anwendung, Hanser, München.Google Scholar
Sharon, A., de Weck, O.L. and Dori, D. (2011), “Project Management vs. Systems Engineering Management: A Practitioners’ View on Integrating the Project and Product Domains”, Systems Engineering, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 427440. http://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20187Google Scholar
Sharon, A., de Weck, O.L. and Dori, D. (2009), “Is There a Complete Project Plan? A Model-Based Project Planning Approach”, Proceedings of Annual INCOSE International Symposium, Vol. 2009, pp. 96109. http://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2009.tb00940.xGoogle Scholar
Sharon, A., de Weck, O.L. and Dori, D. (2013), “Improving project-product lifecycle management with model-based design structure matrix: A joint project management and systems engineering approach”, Systems Engineering, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 413426. http://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21240Google Scholar
Sharon, A. and Dori, D. (2015), “A Project–Product Model–Based Approach to Planning Work Breakdown Structures of Complex System Projects”, IEEE Systems Journal, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 366376. http://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2013.2297491Google Scholar
Wynn, D.C. (2007), Model-based approaches to support process improvement in complex product development, Phd Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wynn, D.C. and Clarkson, P.J. (2005), “Models of Designing”, In: Clarkson, P.J. and Eckert, C. (Ed.), Design process improvement: A review of current practice, Springer London. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-061-0_2Google Scholar
Wynn, D.C. and Clarkson, P.J. (2018), “Process models in design and development”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 161202. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-017-0262-7Google Scholar