Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:50:38.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Systematic Approach to Model Objectives in Predevelopment Projects

Part of: Design Methods and Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Thilo Oliver Richter ,
Albert Albers ,
Johannes Willi Gesk  and
Jan-Hendrik Witt

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This contribution presents a systematic for the elicitation of objectives and the utilization of objectives to identify reference products. The systematic is based on existing meta models. The model of objectives as proposed in this research eases decision-making and outlines the next validation activities. A key success factor is the project transferability between teams, which is often necessary in predevelopment. This is ensured through comprehensibility of objectives which benefits from the linkage between the model of objectives and the knowledge base. The proposed systematic is applied to a predevelopment project which is used as case study. In the case study it has been shown that objectives can be used to identify reference products. The approach is validated in a live-lab setting with seven engineering teams with six graduate students, two engineers of an industrial partner and a research associate. Several workshops were used to train all members of the teams in the systematic. The effects of the systematic are assessed in dedicated interviews, a survey as well as with observation of the engineering teams during milestones and engineering activities between milestones.

Keywords

Integrated product developmentSystems Engineering (SE)Requirements
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 1363 - 1372
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Albers, A. (2010), “Five hypotheses about engineering processes and their consequences”, In: Horváth, I. (Ed.), Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering - Tmce 2010, April 12-16, Ancona, Italy, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering Univ. of Technology, Delft.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Bursac, N., Heimicke, J., Walter, B. and Reiß, N. (Eds.) (2017a), 20 Years of Co-Creation Using Case Based Learning an Integrated Approach for Teaching Innovation and Research in Product Generation Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2011.Google Scholar
Albers, A. and Lohmeyer, Q. (2012), “Advanced systems engineering. Towards a model-based and human-centered methodology”, In: Horváth, I. (Ed.), Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering, Tmce 2012, May 7-11, 2012, Karlsruhe, Germany; Digital Proceedings, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering Delft University of Technology, Delft.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Lohmeyer, Q., Quentin, Ebel, B. and Bjoern, (Eds.) (2011), Dimensions of Objectives in Interdisciplinary Product Development Projects.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Rapp, S., Birk, C. and Bursac, N. (Eds.) (2017b), Die Frühe Phase der PGE – Produktgenerationsentwicklung.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Rapp, S., Heitger, N., Wattenberg, F. and Bursac, N. (2018), “Reference products in pge – product generation engineering: analyzing challenges based on the system hierarchy”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 70, pp. 469–474. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.02.046.Google Scholar
Allmann, C. (2007), “Automobile vorentwicklung, anforderungsmanagement auf der grünen wiese”, GI Softwaretechnik-Trends, Vol. 27 No. 1.Google Scholar
Booton, R.C. and Ramo, S. (1984), “The development of systems engineering”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. AES-20 No. 4, pp. 306–310. http://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.1984.4502055.Google Scholar
Buede, D.M. and Miller, W.D. (2016), The Engineering Design of Systems: Models and Methods, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, Hoboken, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.G. (1988), “Predevelopment activities determine new product success”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 237–247. http://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(88)90007-7.Google Scholar
Darlington, M.J. and Culley, S.J. (2002), “Current research in the engineering design requirement”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 216 No. 3, pp. 375–388. http://doi.org/10.1243/0954405021520049.Google Scholar
Ebel, B. (2015), “Modellierung von Zielsystemen in der interdisziplinären produktentstehung”, Dissertation, Institut für Produktentwicklung (IPEK), Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Karlsruhe, 2015.Google Scholar
Ebert, C. (2012), Systematisches Requirements Engineering: Anforderungen ermitteln, spezifizieren, analysieren und verwalten, Vol. 4., überarb. Aufl., dpunkt-Verl., Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Eisner, H. (1997), “Essentials of project and systems engineering management”, Choice Reviews Online, Vol. 34 No. 08, pp. 34-4492–34-4492. http://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.34-4492.Google Scholar
Erman, L.D., Hayes-Roth, F., Lesser, V.R. and Reddy, D.R. (1980), “The hearsay-ii speech-understanding system: integrating knowledge to resolve uncertainty”, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 213–253. http://doi.org/10.1145/356810.356816.Google Scholar
Holder, K., Zech, A., Ramsaier, M., Stetter, R., Niedermeier, H.-P., Rudolph, S. and Till, M. (2017), “Model-based requirements management in gear systems design based on graph-based design languages”, Applied Sciences, Vol. 7 No. 11, p. 1112. http://doi.org/10.3390/app7111112.Google Scholar
Matthiesen, S., Meboldt, M. and Lohmeyer, Q. (2012), “The dilemma of managing iterations in time-to-market development processes”, In: Heidig, P. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Modelling and Management Engineering Processes, Univ , Cambrigde, UK, pp. 127–140.Google Scholar
Mohagheghi, P. and Aagedal, J. (2007), “Evaluating quality in model-driven engineering”, In International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering (MISE 2007): Proceedings, ICSE 2007 workshops [20-26 May 2007, Minneapolis ICSE 2007, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 5/20/2007 - 5/26/2007, IEEE, Piscataway, N.J., p. 6. http://doi.org/10.1109/MISE.2007.6.Google Scholar
Nuseibeh, B. and Easterbrook, S. (2000), “Requirements Engineering”, In: Finkelstein, A. (Ed.), The future of software engineering, Limerick, Ireland, 6/4/2000 - 6/11/2000, ACM, New York, pp. 35–46. http://doi.org/10.1145/336512.336523.Google Scholar
Schulze, S.-O. (2016), “Systems Engineering”, In: Lindemann, U. (Ed.), Handbuch Produktentwicklung, Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, München, pp. 153–184.Google Scholar
Stechert, C. (2010), “Modellierung komplexer anforderungen. Bericht Nr. 75”, Dissertation, Institut für Konstruktionstechnik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, 2010.Google Scholar
Summers, J.D. and Shah, J.J. (2010), “Mechanical engineering design complexity metrics: Size, coupling, and solvability”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 132 No. 2, p. 21004. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000759.Google Scholar
van Lamsweerde, A. (2004), “Goal-oriented requirements enginering: A roundtrip from research to practice”, In 12th IEEE international requirements engineering conference, Kyoto, Japan, Sept. 6-10, 2004, IEEE, pp. 3–6. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICRE.2004.1335648.Google Scholar
Walden, D.D., Roedler, G.J., Forsberg, K., Hamelin, R.D., Shortell, T.M. and Kaffenberger, R. (Eds.) (2017), INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbuch: Ein Leitfaden für Systemlebenszyklus-Prozesse und -Aktivitäten INCOSE-TP-2003-002-04 2015, Deutsche Übersetzung der vierten Ausgabe, GfSE e.V, München.Google Scholar