Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:10:33.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Student Reflections on Needs Finding in Community-Based Design Work

Part of: Design Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Robert P. Loweth ,
Shanna R. Daly ,
Kathleen H. Sienko  and
Jiangqiong Liu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Reflection is an important component in design skill development that helps designers better understand their design problem, develop better solutions, and improve their design approaches. This study explored the information that a student design team reflected on as part of a needs finding experience and the outcomes from these reflections. During the needs finding experience, the team exhibited reflection-in- action behavior as they used available data to form and iterate on explanatory hypotheses about potential community needs. After the needs finding experience, the team exhibited reflection-on-action behavior as they drew connections between their interview approaches and stakeholder responses and discussed changes they might make in the future. The team also identified situations where contextual factors of the stakeholder impacted their interviews, but during these reflections did not indicate how they might adapt their approaches to account for such factors in the future. These findings show that student designers can use reflection as a tool to improve their needs finding process but would benefit from pedagogical structures that might help them reflect more effectively.

Keywords

Reflective practiceNeeds findingCollaborative designDecision makingDesign education
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 569 - 578
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Abedini, N.C., Gruppen, L.D., Kolars, J.C. and Kumagai, A.K. (2012), “Understanding the effects of short-term international service–learning trips on medical students”, Academic Medicine, Vol. 87 No. 6, p. 820. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31825396d8.Google Scholar
Adams, R., Aleong, R., Goldstein, M. and Solis, F. (2018), “Rendering a multi-dimensional problem space as an unfolding collaborative inquiry process”, Design Studies, Vol. 57, pp. 37–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.03.006.Google Scholar
Aranda-Jan, C.B., Jagtap, S. and Moultrie, J. (2016), “Towards a framework for holistic contextual design for low-resource settings”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 43–63.Google Scholar
Borrego, M., Douglas, E.P. and Amelink, C.T. (2009), “Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 98 No. 1, pp. 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x.Google Scholar
Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D. (1985), “Promoting reflection in learning: A model”, in Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D. (Eds.), Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, RoutledgeFalmer, New York, NY, pp. 18–40.Google Scholar
Bray, J.N., Lee, J., Smith, L.L. and Yorks, L. (2000), Collaborative Inquiry in Practice: Action, Reflection, and Meaning Making, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Brockbank, A., McGill, I. and Beech, N. (2002), “Reflective learning in practice”, in Brockbank, A., McGill, I. and Beech, N. (Eds.), Reflective Learning in Practice, Gower Publishing Company, Burlington, VT, pp. 18–28.Google Scholar
Bucciarelli, L.L. (1994), Designing Engineers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Creswell, J.W. (2003), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd ed., SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Dong, A. and MacDonald, E. (2017), “From observations to insights: The hilly road to value creation”, in Christensen, B.T., Ball, L.J. and Halskov, K. (Eds.), Analysing Design Thinking: Studies of Cross-Cultural Co-Creation, Taylor and Francis Group, London, UK, pp. 465–482.Google Scholar
Dorst, K. (2015), Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Dorst, K. and Cross, N. (2001), “Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution”, Design Studies, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6.Google Scholar
Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D. and Leifer, L.J. (2005), “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94 No. 1, pp. 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.Google Scholar
Heron, J. and Reason, P. (1997), “A participatory inquiry paradigm”, Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300302.Google Scholar
IDEO. (2015), The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design, IDEO.org, Canada.Google Scholar
Kolb, D.A. (1984), Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Kouprie, M. and Sleeswijk Visser, F. (2009), “A framework for empathy in design: Stepping into and out of the user's life”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820902875033.Google Scholar
Kumagai, A.K. and Lypson, M.L. (2009), “Beyond cultural competence: Critical consciousness, social justice, and multicultural education”, Academic Medicine, Vol. 84 No. 6, p. 782. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a42398.Google Scholar
Leydens, J.A. and Lucena, J.C. (2009), “Listening as a missing dimension in engineering education: Implications for sustainable community development efforts”, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2009.2032383.Google Scholar
Leydens, J.A., Moskal, B.M. and Pavelich, M.J. (2004), “Qualitative methods used in the assessment of engineering education”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93 No. 1, pp. 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00789.x.Google Scholar
Luck, R. (2007), “Learning to talk to users in participatory design situations”, Design Studies, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.002.Google Scholar
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. and Saldana, J. (2014), “Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed., SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Mohedas, I., Daly, S.R. and Sienko, K.H. (2014a), “Design ethnography in capstone design: Investigating student use and perceptions”, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 880–900.Google Scholar
Mohedas, I., Daly, S.R. and Sienko, K.H. (2014b), “Gathering and synthesizing information during the development of user requirements and engineering specifications”, 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 15-18, 2014, ASEE.Google Scholar
Patnaik, D. and Becker, R. (1999), “Needfinding: The why and how of uncovering people's needs”, Design Management Journal (Former Series), Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.1999.tb00250.x.Google Scholar
Patton, M.Q. (2015), Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 4th ed., SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Schön, D.A. (1983), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Schön, D.A. (1992), “Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580516.Google Scholar
Sienko, K.H., Young, M.R., Effah Kaufmann, E., Obed, S., Turpin, C., Danso, K.A., Opare-Addo, H.S., et al. (2018), “Global health design: Clinical immersion, opportunity identification and definition, and design experiences”, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 34 No. 2(B), pp. 780–800.Google Scholar
Stompff, G., Smulders, F. and Henze, L. (2016), “Surprises are the benefits: Reframing in multidisciplinary design teams”, Design Studies, Vol. 47, pp. 187–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.004.Google Scholar
Valkenburg, R. and Dorst, K. (1998), “The reflective practice of design teams”, Design Studies, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00011-8.Google Scholar
Watkins, R., Meiers, M.W. and Visser, Y.L. (2012), A Guide to Assessing Needs: Essential Tools for Collecting Information, Making Decisions, and Achieving Development Results, The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Wood, A.E. and Mattson, C.A. (2016), “Design for the developing world: Common pitfalls and how to avoid them”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 138 No. 3, p. 031101. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032195.Google Scholar
Zenios, S., Makower, J. and Yock, P. (Eds.). (2010), Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar