Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:06:29.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Methodical Approach to Support Conceptual Design for Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing

Part of: Design for Additive Manufacturing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Hagen Watschke ,
Sebastian Kuschmitz ,
Julius Heubach ,
Guido Lehne  and
Thomas Vietor

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Additive manufacturing (AM) opens new possibilities for innovative product designs. However, due to a lack of knowledge and restrained creativity because of design fixations, design engineers do not take advantage of AM's design freedom. Especially multi-material AM provides new opportunities for functional integration that hardly considered in ideation. To overcome barriers in the development of solution ideas and utilizing such new design potentials, new design methods and tools are needed. Therefore, in this contribution, a methodological approach for a function-oriented provision of solution principles specific to material extrusion is presented. A tool is developed to facilitate effective guidance in developing solution ideas and to foster a realistic concretization by providing a combination of opportunistic and restrictive AM knowledge. Besides general levers of AM, process-specific design opportunities support the design engineers in exploiting AM's potentials, especially those who are not familiar with Design for AM. Finally, the applicability of the methodological approach is evaluated in an academic study by means of redesigning a hand prosthesis with a grab function.

Keywords

Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)Additive ManufacturingConceptual designDesign methods
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 659 - 668
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Becker, R., Grzesiak, A. and Henning, A. (2005), “Rethink assembly design”, Assembly Automation, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 262–266. http://doi.org/10.1108/01445150510626370.Google Scholar
Maidin Bin, S. Campbell, I. and Pei, E. (2012), “Development of a design feature database to support design for additive manufacturing”, Assembly Automation, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 235–244. http://doi.org/10.1108/01445151211244375.Google Scholar
Blösch-Paidosh, A. and Shea, K. (2017), “Design Heuristics for Additive Manufacturing”, DS 87-5 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17): Vol. 5: Design for X, Design to X, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25 August 2017, The Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 91–100.Google Scholar
Blösch-Paidosh, A. and Shea, K. (2018), “Design Heuristics for Additive Manufacturing Validated Through a User Study”, Journal of Mechanical Design, MD-17-1838. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041051.Google Scholar
Fu, K.K., Yang, M.C. and Wood, K.L. (2016), “Design Principles: Literature Review, Analysis, and Future Directions”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 138 No. 10, p. 101103. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034105.Google Scholar
Kamps, T., Gralow, M., Schlick, G. and Reinhart, G. (2017), “Systematic Biomimetic Part Design for Additive Manufacturing”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 65, pp. 259–266. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.04.054.Google Scholar
Kumke, M., Watschke, H., Hartogh, P., Bavendiek, A.-K. and Vietor, T. (2017), “Methods and tools for identifying and leveraging additive manufacturing design potentials”, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 481–493. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-017-0399-7.Google Scholar
Kumke, M., Watschke, H. and Vietor, T. (2016), “A new methodological framework for design for additive manufacturing”, Virtual and Physical Prototyping, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 3–19. http://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1139377.Google Scholar
Laverne, F., Segonds, F., Anwer, N. and Le Coq, M. (2015), “Assembly Based Methods to Support Product Innovation in Design for Additive Manufacturing: An Exploratory Case Study”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 137 No. 12, 121701-1–8. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031589.Google Scholar
Laverne, F., Segonds, F., D'Antonio, G. and Le Coq, M. (2017), “Enriching design with X through tailored additive manufacturing knowledge: a methodological proposal”, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 279–288. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-016-0314-7.Google Scholar
Leigh, S.J., Bradley, R.J., Purssell, C.P., Billson, D.R. and Hutchins, D.A. (2012), “A simple, low-cost conductive composite material for 3D printing of electronic sensors”, PloS one, Vol. 7 No. 11, p. e49365. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049365.Google Scholar
Pradel, P., Zhu, Z., Bibb, R. and Moultrie, J. (2018), “Investigation of design for additive manufacturing in professional design practice”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 29 No. 4-5, pp. 165–200. http://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2018.1454589.Google Scholar
Richter, T., Watschke, H., Schumacher, F. and Vietor, T. (2018), “Exploitation of potentials of additive manufacturing in ideation workshops”, The Fifth International Conference on Design Creativity, January 31–February 02 2018, University of Bath, UK.Google Scholar
Roth, K. (2000), Konstruieren mit Konstruktionskatalogen: Band 1: Konstruktionslehre, Vol. 1, 3rd ed., Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Roth, K. (2001), Konstruieren Mit Konstruktionskatalogen: Band 2: Konstruktionskataloge, Vol. 2, 3rd ed., Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-17467-4Google Scholar
Rothe, S., Blech, C., Watschke, H., Vietor, T. and Langer, S.C. (2018), “Numerical modelling of additively manufactured acoustic black holes”, 47th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering Impact of Noise Control Engineering (inter-noise 2018), 26–29 August 2018, Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
Stone, R.B. and Wood, K.L. (1999), “Development of a Functional Basis for Design”, Proceedings of DETC99, 1999.Google Scholar
Vaezi, M., Chianrabutra, S., Mellor, B. and Yang, S. (2013), “Multiple material additive manufacturing – Part 1: a review”, Virtual and Physical Prototyping, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 19–50. http://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2013.778175.Google Scholar
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V. (2018), Design of technical products and systems: Model of product design, Vol. 03.100.40 No. 2221 Blatt 1, Entwurf, Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin.Google Scholar
Watschke, H., Bavendiek, A.-K., Giannakos, A. and Vietor, T. (2017), “A methodical approach to support ideation for additive manufacturing in design education”, DS 87-5 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17), 21-25 August, 2017: Vol. 5: Design for X, Design to X, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25 August 2017, The Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 41–50.Google Scholar
Watschke, H., Hilbig, K. and Vietor, T. (2019), “Design and Characterization of Electrically Conductive Structures Additively Manufactured by Material Extrusion”, Applied Sciences, 2019, Vol. 9 No. 4, p. 779. http://doi.org/10.3390/app9040779.Google Scholar
Watschke, H., Waalkes, L., Schumacher, C. and Vietor, T. (2018), “Development of Novel Test Specimens for Characterization of Multi-Material Parts Manufactured by Material Extrusion”, Applied Sciences, Vol. 8 No. 8, p. 1220. http://doi.org/10.3390/app8081220.Google Scholar
Weiss, F., Binz, H. and Roth, D. (2016), “Conception of a design catalogue for the development of functionalities with additive manufacturing”, DS 85-2: Proceedings of NordDesign 2016, Volume 2, Trondheim, Norway, 10th - 12th August 2016, August 10–12 2016, Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
Weiss, F., Roth, D. and Binz, H. (2018), “Content and Functions of an Internet-Based Platform for Supporting Development of Additively Manufactured Parts”, Proceedings of 15th International Design Conference, May 21–24 2018, Dubrovnik, Croatia.Google Scholar
Wohlers Associates, I. (2018), “Wohlers report 2018: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry”, Annual Worldwide Progress Report, Wohlers report, 23rd, Wohlers Associates, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
Yang, S., Page, T. and Zhao, Y.F. (2018), “Understanding the Role of Additive Manufacturing Knowledge in Stimulating Design Innovation for Novice Designers”, Proceedings of the ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Quebec, Canada, August 26–29 2018, ASME, V004T05A003. http://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-85644.Google Scholar
Yang, S. and Zhao, Y.F. (2015), “Additive manufacturing-enabled design theory and methodology: a critical review”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 80 No. 1-4, pp. 327–342. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6994-5.Google Scholar
Yang, S. and Zhao, Y.F. (2016), “Conceptual design for assembly in the context of additive manufacturing”, Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium 2016, August 8–10 2016, University of Texas at Austin, USA.Google Scholar
Yao, X., Moon, S.K., Bi, G. and Wei, J. (2018), “A multi-material part design framework in additive manufacturing”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 16 No. 11, p. 2369. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2025-7.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, S. and Seifert, C.M. (2010), “Cognitive Heuristics in Design Ideation”, Proceedings of 11th International Design Conference, May 17–20 2010, Dubrovnik, Croatia.Google Scholar
Ziebart, J.R. (2012), Ein konstruktionsmethodischer Ansatz zur Funktionsintegration, Zugl.: Braunschweig, Techn. Univ., Diss., 2012, Institut für Konstruktionstechnik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Bericht, Vol. 83, 1. Aufl., Dr. Hut, München.Google Scholar