Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:22:42.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improvement of Collaboration between Testing and Simulation Departments on the Example of a Motorcycle Manufacturer

Part of: Collaborative Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Julian Ralf Schönwald ,
Christian Forsteneichner ,
David Vahrenhorst  and
Kristin Paetzold
Julian Ralf Schönwald*
Affiliation:
Universität der Bundeswehr München;
Christian Forsteneichner
Affiliation:
BMW Motorrad
David Vahrenhorst
Affiliation:
Universität der Bundeswehr München;
Kristin Paetzold
Affiliation:
Universität der Bundeswehr München;
*
Contact: Schönwald, Julian Ralf, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Institute for technical product development, Germany, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In testing and simulation departments in product development (PD) data types, data structures and data storage are often very different. Exchange of data and information is normally not automated and often not supported by management systems. This can lead to loss of time and information. A literature study in combination with 20 expert interviews and the analysis of documents as well as data storage structures and IT systems in a PD department of a motorcycle manufacturer were performed. Test and simulation processes were classified and standardized, documentation formats analyzed, standards in Test Data Management (TDM) and Simulation Data Management (SDM) as well as verification and validation processes compared. IT support in SDM is better than in TDM. An integration of TDM and SDM could lead to improved collaboration between testing and simulation departments. Options for this integration could be specific ontologies, object-oriented interfaces, a higher-level intermediate application, use of a common standard or integration of one standard into another one.

Keywords

TestingSimulationCase studyCollaborative designData Management
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 149 - 158
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Anderl, R. and Malzacher, J. (2009), “SimPDM – Simulationsdatenmanagement-Standard nach Maß”, CAD CAM, No. 1–2, pp. 38–41.Google Scholar
Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN). (2015), DIN EN ISO 9001:2015 Qualitätsmanagementsysteme – Anforderungen, DIN-Normenausschuss Qualitätsmanagement, Statistik und Zertifizierungsgrundlagen (NQSZ), Deutschland, p. 71.Google Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K. and Meerkamm, H. (2013), “Integrierte Produktentwicklung - Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit, Konstruktion,” available at:https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446436275.Google Scholar
Engel, A. (2010), “Verification, Validation, and Testing of Engineered Systems, In: Sage, A. (Hrsg.): Wiley Series in Systems Engineering and Management, 73rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470618851.Google Scholar
Herfeld, U., Kreimeyer, M., Deubzer, F., Frank, T., Lindemann, U. and Knaust, U. (2006), “Verknüpfung von Komponenten und Funktionen zur Integration von Konstruktion und Simulation in der Karosserieentwicklung”, VDI Berichte, No. 1967 I, pp. 259–276.Google Scholar
ISO. (2014a), “ISO/TS 13499:2014 Road Vehicles – Multimedia Data Exchange Format for Impact Tests”.Google Scholar
ISO. (2014b), “ISO 10303-209:2014-12 Industrial Automation Systems and Integration - Product Data Representation and Exchange - Part 209: Application Protocol: Multidisciplinary Analysis and Design”.Google Scholar
Krehmer, H., Meerkamm, H. and Wartzack, S. (2011), “Monitoring a property based product development – from requirements to a mature product”, Iced'11, No. August, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Kreimeyer, M., Herfeld, U., Deubzer, F. and Lindemann, U. (2006), “Effiziente Zusammenarbeit von Konstruktions- und Simulationsabteilungen in der Automobilindustrie”, Competence in Design and Development, Vol. 02 No. 01, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Luft, T., Krehmer, H. and Wartzack, S. (2013), “An advanced procedure model for property - based product development”, International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED13, No. August, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Maier, A.M., Doenmez, D., Hepperle, C., Kreimeyer, M., Lindemann, U. and Clarkson, P.J. (2011), “Improving Communication in Design: Recommendations from the Literature”, 18th International Conference on Engineering Design, Impacting Society through Engineering Design (ICED 11), No. August.Google Scholar
Materna, R. (2010), OpenMDM - What's Behind?, Audi AG, Ingolstadt, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.-H. (2007), Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer, No. 2, p. 617.Google Scholar
Pischinger, S. and Seiffer, U. (2016), Vieweg Handbuch Kraftfahrzeugtechnik, 8. Auflage., Springer Vieweg Verlag, Wiesbaden, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-8298-1.Google Scholar
ProSTEPiViP. (n.d.), “STEP AP209 online”, available at: http://www.ap209.org (accessed 23 April 2018).Google Scholar
Rapf, D. (2016), “Standards im Datenmanagement ASAM ODS und openMDM”, ATZ Extra, Wiesbaden, May, pp. 32–39.Google Scholar
Rapf, D. (2017), “The openMDM roadmap The future of measured data management”, Testing Expo Stuttgart 2017, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Rapf, D. and Schwarzbach, M. (2016), “openMDM ® – an Open Source Platform for Measured Data Management”, Automotive Diagnostics Systems Summit 2016, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Sargent, R.G. (2013), “Verification and validation of simulation models”, Journal of Simulation, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 12–24.10.1057/jos.2012.20Google Scholar
Schönwald, J., Fleskes, J., Forsteneichner, C. and Paetzold, K. (2018), “A method for a detailed analysis of verification and validation processes in product development”, International DESIGN Conference 2018, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 1313–1324.Google Scholar
Schönwald, J., Vahrenhorst, D., Chojnacki, A., Zschako, S., Sundarp, L. and Paetzold, K. (2018), “Integration von Versuchs- und Simulationsdatenmanagement in der Produktentwicklung”, DFX 2018: 29th Symposium on Design for X, München, pp. 107–118.Google Scholar
Schweigert, S., D'Albert, H. and Lindemann, U. (2016), “Enhancement of collaboration and communication between design and simulation departments by methods of requirements engineering”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, Vol. DS 84, pp. 1397–1406.Google Scholar
Arbeitskreis PLM, VDA. (2008), “VDA 4967: Simulation Data Management – Integration of Simulation and Computation in a PDM- Environment (SimPDM), No. Version 2.0, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
VDI-Gesellschaft Entwicklung Konstruktion Vertrieb. (1993), VDI 2221: Methodik Zum Entwickeln Und Konstruieren Technischer Systeme Und Produkte, Deutschland, available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.Google Scholar
VDI-Gesellschaft Entwicklung Konstruktion Vertrieb. (2004), VDI-Richtlinie 2206: Entwicklungsmethodik Für Mechatronische Systeme, Beuth Verlag, p. 118.Google Scholar
Wittek, A. (2017), “Setup Development Environment for the OpenMDM ( R ) Application Eclipse Mdm”.Google Scholar