Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:45:50.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design of Hybrid Components Joining Zone through Sensitivity Analysis

Part of: Lightweight Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Renan Siqueira ,
Sean Shugar ,
Iryna Mozgova  and
Roland Lachmayer

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Multi-material structures are a trending topic for the industry. With a high application potential, such as lightweight or extended life cycle, different manufacturing technologies are further developed for this intent. One of these technologies is Tailored Forming, a process-chain capable of joining different metals and creating massive hybrid components. In parallel to this development, new challenges rise for design, which has the responsibility of finding an optimal use of this technology and produce higher- performance products. However, this task cannot be solved by conventional engineering approach, since strong manufacturing constraints are involved and a lack of understanding about the joining zone formed between the materials still exists. To fill this gap, the objective of this study is to analyse the influence of the joining zone design over the structure behaviour and establish a suitable design method. For that, a computer-aided environment was constructed and a parametric sensitivity analysis was executed, taking a hybrid shaft as example. At the end, the simulation's results allowed a multi-objective optimisation and were able to generate first design guidelines.

Keywords

Computer Aided Design (CAD)Design methodsLightweight designMulti-materialSensitivity Analysis
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 2697 - 2704
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Lopez Jaimes, A. and Coello, S. Z. M., C, C. A. (2001), Optimization in Polymer Processing, Nova Science Publisher, Inc., chapter An Introduction to Multiobjective Optimization Techniques.Google Scholar
Behrens, B.-A., Bouguecha, A., Moritz, J., Bonk, C., Stonis, M., Klose, C., Blohm, T., Chugreeva, A., Duran, D., Matthias, T., Golovko, O., Thuerer, S. E. and Uhe, J. (2017), 22. umformtechnisches kolloquium, in ‘Aktuelle Forschungsschwerpunkte in der Massivumformung’, Hannoversches Forschungsinstitut fuer Fertigungsverfahren.Google Scholar
Behrens, B.-A., Chugreev, A. and Matthias, T. (2018), “Characterisation of the joining zone of serially arranged hybrid semi-finished components”, AIP Conference Proceedings 1960(1), 040002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5034856Google Scholar
Box, G. and Draper, N. (2007), Response Surfaces, Mixtures, and Ridge Analyses, second edition edn, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New Jersey. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470072768Google Scholar
Breitkopf, P. and Coelho, R., eds (2010), Multidisciplinary Design Optimization in Computational Mechanics, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New Jersey. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118600153Google Scholar
Brockmoeller, T., Gembarski, P. C., Mozgova, I. and Lachmayer, R. (2017), “Design catalogue in a cae environment for the illustration of tailored forming”, in ‘59th Ilmenau Scientific Colloquium”, Ilmenau, Germany.Google Scholar
GmbH, Dynardo (2018), Methods for multi-disciplinary optimization and robustness analysis, issue March 2 No. 2018 edn.Google Scholar
Harzheim, L. (2014), Strukturoptimierung, 2. aufl. edn, Verlag EUROPA-LEHRMITTEL, Haan-Gruiten.Google Scholar
Lauter, C. (2014), Entwicklung und Herstellung von Hybridbauteilen aus Metallen und Faserverbundkunststoffen fuer den Leichtbau im Automobil, PhD thesis, University Paderborn.Google Scholar
Myers, R. D. M. and Anderson-Cook, C., eds (2009), Response Surface Methodology, third edition edn, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Roper, S., Li, D., Florea, V., Woischwill, C. and Kim, I. Y. (2018), “Multi-material topology optimization: A practical approach and application, in ‘WCX World Congress Experience”, SAE International. https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0110Google Scholar
Saltelli, A., ed. (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Siqueira, R., Bibani, M., Mozgova, I. and Lachmayer, R. (2019), “Case-based parametric analysis: A method for design of tailored forming hybrid material component”, in ‘Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 39th ISAT 2018, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 14–28.10.1007/978-3-319-99996-8_2Google Scholar
Siqueira, R., Mozgova, I. and Lachmayer, R. (2018), “An interfacial zone evolutionary optimization method with manufacturing constraints for hybrid components”, Journal of Computational Design and Engineering. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2018.10.003Google Scholar
Ullman, D. (2010), The Mechanical Design Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar