Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:54:03.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptual Design of Urban E-Bus Systems with Special Focus on Battery Technology

Part of: Mobility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Dietmar Göhlich ,
Tu-Anh Fay  and
Sangyoung Park
Dietmar Göhlich
Affiliation:
Department of Methods for Product Development and Mechatronics Technische UniversitätBerlin;
Tu-Anh Fay
Affiliation:
Department of Methods for Product Development and Mechatronics Technische UniversitätBerlin;
Sangyoung Park*
Affiliation:
Department of Smart Mobility Systems Technische UniversitätBerlin
*
Contact: Park, Sangyoung, Technical University of Beril;n, Smart Mobility Systems, Germany, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many cities have announced ambitious plans to introduce zero-emission electric bus systems. The transformation process to electric bus systems opens up a vast design space as different charging strategies, charging technologies and battery types are available. Therefore, a profound assessment strategy is necessary to find a “most suitable system solution” under given strategic and operational requirements.

In this study, we present a new methodology for conceptual design of urban electric bus systems. First, the available e-bus technologies are analysed with a special focus on charging systems, battery technology and aging. Relational functional analysis is used to derive a suitable simulation model. Based on the operational requirements, an energetic simulation of the e-bus is carried out, and the required battery capacity is obtained. Subsequently, the design space is reduced by applying a qualitative cost- technology compatibility matrix taking cost and battery aging into account. The applicability of the model is shown for an exemplary realistic operational scenario to identify three most expedient concepts, which are finally validated with an in-depth analysis.

Keywords

Conceptual designDesign methodologySustainabilityUrban electric bus systemsBattery and charging technologies
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 2823 - 2832
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Aurbach, D. (2000), “Review of selected electrode–solution interactions which determine the performance of Li and Li ion batteries”. In: Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 89 No. 2, pp. 206–218.Google Scholar
Bünnagel, C. (2016), “Sileo 18: Ein revolutionäres Konzept”. In: Verkehr und Technik, Bd. Vol. 6, pp. 196–200.Google Scholar
Eudy, L., Prohaska, R., Kelly, K. and Post, M. (2016), “Foothill Transit Battery Electric Bus Demonstration Results”. Technical Report. NREL/TP-5400-65274. Hg. v. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)Google Scholar
Fay, T.-A. (2019), “Methodischer Technologievergleich von Systemkonzepten für die Elektrifizierung von Stadtbussen”. Dissertation. Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin. Methoden der Produktentwicklung und Mechatronik.Google Scholar
Gao, Z., Lin, Z., LaClair, T. J., Liu, C., Li, J.-M., Birky, A. K. and Ward, J. (2017), “Battery capacity and recharging needs for electric buses in city transit service”. In: Energy, Vol. 122, pp. 588–600. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.101.Google Scholar
Göhlich, D., Fay, T.-A.; Jefferies, D., Lauth, E., Kunith, A and Zhang, X. (2018), “Design of urban electric bus systems”. In: Des. Sci. Vol. 4, S. 0. http://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2018.10.Google Scholar
Gorbea, C., Hellenbrand, D., Srivastava, T.; Biedermann, W. and Lindemann, U. (2010), “Compatibility matrix methodology applied to the identification of vehicle architectures and design requirements”. In: International Design Conference. Design 2010. Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 17 - 20, pp. 733–742.Google Scholar
Hellenbrand, D. and Lindemann, U. (2008): “Using the dsm to support the selection of product concepts”. In: 10th International Design Structure Matrix Conference. DSM'08. Stockholm, Sweden, 11–12 November 2008, pp. 363–374Google Scholar
Jefferies, D. and Göhlich, D. (2018), “Integrated TCO Assessment of Bus Network Electrification Considering Rescheduling and Delays”, Modelling Framework and Case Study. In: EVS31 International Electric Vehicle Symposium & Exhibition. Accepted for publication, Kobe, Japan.Google Scholar
Koebel, C. (2014), “Update Primove Technology and Projects”, VDV Elektrobusse 2014. Verband Deutscher Verkehrsunternehmen (VDV). Berlin, 2014.Google Scholar
Lindemann, U. (2009), Methodische Entwicklung technischer Produkte. Methoden flexibel und situationsgerecht anwenden. 3., korrigierte, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (VDI-Buch), Aufl. Berlin, Heidelberg. Online verfügbar unter http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10323208.Google Scholar
Ly, T.-A., Göhlich, D. and Heide, L. (2016), “Assessment of the interaction of charging system and battery technology for the use in urban battery electric bus systems”. In: IEEE (Hg.): Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference. The 13th IEEE Vehicle and Propulsion Conference. Hangzhou, China, 17.-20.10.2016. IEEEGoogle Scholar
Millner, A. (2010), “Modeling Lithium Ion battery degradation in electric vehicles”. In: 2010 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies for an Efficient and Reliable Electricity Supply. Waltham, MA, pp. 349–356.Google Scholar
Nørregaard, K., Johnsen, B. and Gravesen, C. H. (2016), Battery degradation in electric buses. Danish Technological InstituteGoogle Scholar
Park, S., Zhang, L. and Chakraborty, S. (2017): “Battery assignment and scheduling for drone delivery businesses”. In IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, July 24-26, 2017.Google Scholar
Rogge, M. and Sauer, D. U. (2013), “Fast charging of battery buses and its impact on the aging of various lithium-ion cell types”. In: Intelligente Transport- und Verkehrssysteme und -dienste Niedersachsen e.V. (Hg.): Proceedings of the 10th Hybrid and Electric Vehicles Symposium, Braunschweig, pp. 249–266.Google Scholar
Rogge, M., Wollny, S and Sauer, D. (2015), “Fast Charging Battery Buses for the Electrification of Urban Public Transport—A Feasibility Study Focusing on Charging Infrastructure and Energy Storage Requirements”. In: Energies Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 4587–4606. http://doi.org/10.3390/en8054587.Google Scholar
Sinhuber, P., Rohlfs, W. and Sauer, D. U. (2012), “Study on Power and Energy Demand for Sizing the Energy Storage Systems for Electrified Local Public Transport Buses”. In: IEEE (Hg.): IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference 2012. Seoul, Korea (South)Google Scholar
Spangenberg, F. and Göhlich, D. (2013), “Technology Roadmapping Based on Key Performance Indicators. In: Michael Abramovici und Rainer Stark (Hg.): Smart product engineering. Proceedings of the 23rd CIRP Design Conference, Bochum, Germany, March 11th - 13th, 2013. Berlin: Springer (Lecture Notes in Production Engineering), pp. 377–386.Google Scholar