Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:40:05.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building Tangible Augmented Reality Models for Use in Product Development

Part of: ICT for Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Karan Jain  and
Young Mi Choi

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper discusses the issues involved with creating a Tangible Augmented Reality representation of a product so that it can be effectively and validly used to support the product design process. The development of a TAR representation entails building the physical model of the product, a digital model of the product, and developing interactions between the digital and physical representations. Different products have different user interactions, which makes developing TAR representation for products challenging since a new interaction needs to be mimicked. Challenges of developing TAR representations are discussed by investigating TAR representations of four consumer products: a space heater, a MP3 player, an electric can opener, and a seat assist cushion. The goal of TAR representations is to not only communicate the functionality of a product but also to improve the time efficiency of prototyping of physical products. Hence, having a good understanding of the user interactions that need to be developed and planning the representation for construction in the modeling software and AR software is crucial to making the process of developing a TAR representation efficient.

Keywords

Case studySimulationProduct modelling / modelsTangible Augmented Reality
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 1913 - 1922
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Amin, D. and Govilkar, S. (2015), “Comparative Study of Augmented Reality Sdk's”, International Journal on Computational Science & Applications, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 11–26. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsa.2015.5102Google Scholar
Bruseberg, A. and McDonagh-Philip, D. (2002), “Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: A review based on current literature and designers’ feedback.” Applied Ergonomics Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 27–38.Google Scholar
Dickson, P. E., et al. (2017), “An Experience-based Comparison of Unity and Unreal for a Stand-alone 3D game development course”, pp. 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059013Google Scholar
Dönmez, S. (2014), “Computer Aided Industrial Design Software Selection in Industrial Product Design Education at Turkey Using Expert Choice Program”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 106, pp. 682–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.078Google Scholar
Evans, M. (2002), “The integration of rapid prototyping within industrial design practice”, from http://hdl.handle.net/2134/5155Google Scholar
Glover, J. (2018), Unity 2018 Augmented Reality Projects, Packt Publishing Ltd., Birmingham, pp. 13–14Google Scholar
ISO (1998), “ISO 9241-11”, Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs)-Part Vol. 11, Guidance on Usability.Google Scholar
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992), “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development”, Strategic Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 111–125.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. R. (2006), “Usability testing”, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. G. Salvendy: pp. 1275–1316.Google Scholar
McGrath, M. E., Anthony, M. T., et al. (1992), Product development: success through product and cycle-time excellence, Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, V., Lovejoy, W. S. and Beach, D. (1997), “Sharing user experiences in the product innovation process: Participatory design needs participatory communication”, Creativity and Innovation Management Vol. 16, pp. 35–45.Google Scholar
Samantak, R. and Mi, C. Y. (2017), “Employing design representations for userfeedback in the product design lifecycle”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, 4(DS87-4), pp. 563–572. Available at: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85029741860&partnerID=40&md5=5906c0959bf5c5e07aac5679cd1ee29f.Google Scholar