Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:53:44.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing and Improving the Coverage of a Strategic Research Agenda: A Design Theory Approach

Part of: Methods of Design Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Estelle Rémondeau ,
Patrick Cogez ,
Pascal Le Masson  and
Benoît Weil
Estelle Rémondeau*
Affiliation:
MINES ParisTech - PSL Research University, France; AENEAS, France
Patrick Cogez
Affiliation:
AENEAS, France
Pascal Le Masson
Affiliation:
MINES ParisTech - PSL Research University, France;
Benoît Weil
Affiliation:
MINES ParisTech - PSL Research University, France;
*
Contact: Rémondeau, Estelle, MINES ParisTech - PSL Research University, Center for Management Science - CGS i3 UMR CNRS 9217, France, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Strategic Research Agendas (SRA) bring to the research community a prospective and collective vision of a sector and are intended to provide directions for future research efforts. However, some promising innovative areas are not always foreseen in those documents, which raises the question of the relevance and adequacy of their coverage. While engineering design is often considered to translate SRA guidelines into product development, we believe it can also be of great help regarding the design of an SRA. In this paper, we will first address how to assess the scope of an SRA through a framework based on C-K theory, before exploring how to extend it, if need be. To answer those questions, we will examine a high-quality roadmap: the Electronic Components and Systems Strategic Research Agenda (ECS SRA). Our resulting method will provide us the means to assess SRA coverage and to ensure that interesting research areas are not forgotten unintentionally, in order to allow to a further enrichment of the document if needed.

Keywords

Strategic Research AgendaEvaluationDesign engineeringDesign theoryC-K theory
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 2785 - 2794
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Agogué, M. and Cassotti, M. (2012), “Theory-driven experiments: Modeling and testing fixation and stimulation effects on creativity”, 5th Paris Workshop of the Design Theory SIG, Paris, France, January 30, 2012Google Scholar
Agogué, M., Kazakçi, A., Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., Weil, B., Poirel, N. and Cassotti, M. (2014), “The Impact of Type of Examples on Originality: Explaining Fixation and Stimulation Effects”, The Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.37Google Scholar
Agogué, M., Le Masson, P. and Robinson, D.K.R. (2012), “Orphan innovation, or when path-creation goes stale: a design framework to characterise path-dependence in real time”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 603–616. http://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.693672Google Scholar
Amar, G. (2018), “Dealing with the Future: General Considerations and the Case of ‘Mobility’”, In: Subrahmanian, E., Odumosu, T., Tsao, J. (eds), Engineering a Better Future, Springer, Cham, pp. 197–200, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91134-2_16Google Scholar
Barker, D. and Smith, D. (1995), “Technology foresight using roadmaps”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 21–28. http://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(95)98586-HGoogle Scholar
Chen, M., Aknin, P., Lagadec, L.-R., Laousse, D., Le Masson, P. and Weil, B. (2017), “Designing the missing link between science and industry: Organizing partnership based on dual generativity”, International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 4, pp. 307–316Google Scholar
Cogez and al. (2019), Electronic Components & Systems Strategic Research Agenda 2019, available at https://aeneas-office.org/strategy/documents/Google Scholar
Cogez, P., Felk, Y., Le Masson, P. and Weil, B. (2011), “Absorptive capacity for radical innovation: a case study in the semiconductor industry”, IEEE International Technology Management Conference, San Jose, California.Google Scholar
Cogez, P., Kokshagina, O., Le Masson, P. and Weil, B. (2013), “Industry-Wide Technology Roadmapping in Double Unknown - The Case of the Semiconductor Industry”, 2013 IEEE International Technology Management Conference & 19th ICE Conference (ITMC), The Hague, 6/2013, IEEE, pp. 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1109/ITMC.2013.7352611Google Scholar
David, P.A. (1985), “Clio and the economics of QWERTY”, American Economic Review, Vol. 75 No. 2, pp. 332–337.Google Scholar
Galvin, R. (1998), “Science Roadmaps”, Science, Vol. 280 No. 5365, pp. 803–803. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5365.803aGoogle Scholar
Garud, R. and Karnoe, P. (2001), Path Dependence and Creation, Series in Organization and Management, Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
Hatchuel, A. and Weil, B. (2009), “C-K design theory: An advanced formulation”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 181–192. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-008-0043-4Google Scholar
IRDS (2017), IRDS International Roadmap for Device and Systems, available at: (https://irds.ieee.org/roadmap-2017) (14/11/2018)Google Scholar
ITRS (2001-2015), ITRS International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, available at: (http://www.itrs2.net/itrs-reports.html) (14/11/2018)Google Scholar
Kostoff, R. N. and Schaller, R. R. (2001), “Science and technology roadmaps”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.922473Google Scholar
Lee, S. and Park, Y. (2005), “Customization of technology roadmaps according to roadmapping purposes: Overall process and detailed modules”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 72 No. 5, pp. 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.11.006Google Scholar
Le Masson, P., Weil, B. and Hatchuel, A. (2017), Design Theory, Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50277-9_2Google Scholar
Le Masson, P., Weil, B., Hatchuel, A. and Cogez, P. (2012), “Why aren't they locked in waiting games? Unlocking rules and the ecology of concepts in the semiconductor industry”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 617–630.Google Scholar
Phaal, R., Farrukh, C.J.P. and Probert, D.R. (2004), “Technology roadmapping--A planning framework for evolution and revolution”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 71 No. 1, pp. 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00072-6.Google Scholar
Robinson, D.K.R. and Propp, T. (2008), “Multi-path mapping for alignment strategies in emerging science and technologies”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 75 No. 4, pp. 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.02.002Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. (1976), “The Direction of Technological Change: Inducement Mechanisms and Focusing Devices”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1086/450399Google Scholar
Vourc'h, G., Brun, J., Ducrot, C., Cosson, J.-F., Le Masson, P. and Weil, B. (2018), “Using design theory to foster innovative cross-disciplinary research: Lessons learned from a research network focused on antimicrobial use and animal microbes’ resistance to antimicrobials”, Veterinary and Animal Science, Vol. 6, pp. 12–20. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2018.04.001Google Scholar
Willyard, C.H. and McClees, C. (1987), “Motorola's technology roadmap process”, Research Management, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00345334.1987.11757057Google Scholar