Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:40:32.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Integral Design Framework for Multi-Disciplinary Design

Part of: Collaborative Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Wim Zeiler

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A comprehensive domain independent system-level perspective of conceptualization of design is a major driver for successful product development. Such a general design model, Integral Design, was developed based on a specific Dutch design method, Methodical design, which was aimed specifically for applications in the Mechanical Engineering domain. The design method was specifically developed with the help of experiences designers and is meant for young students in a multi-disciplinary design context, such as building design. Integral design provides a suitable framework, existing of phases and specific steps, for guiding users through the design process. It support not only the designers but also helps them to make the process explicit and to communicate the actions and results to their stakeholders. The focus in this paper is on presenting the overall frame work of the design method. In the Netherlands in several bachelor and master educational programs at Technical High schools and the University of Technology Eindhoven use this model to teach students mechanical engineering design and building services design. As such it is one of the most popular design method in the Netherlands.

Keywords

Collaborative designDesign methodsDesign process
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 31 - 38
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Andreasen, M.M., Hansen, C.T. and Cash, P. (2015), Conceptual Design, Springer.Google Scholar
Atkinson, H. and Opperheimer, M.R. (2016), “Design Research – History, theory, practice: histories for future-focussed thinking”, Proceedings DRS 2016, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. von, (1976), General Systems Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, George Brazillers, New York.Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. (1994), “A process-based approach to computer supported engineering design”, PhD Thesis Universiteit Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Boulding, K. (1956), “General Systems Theory: The skeleton of science”, Management Science, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 197–208.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, A. and Blessing, L.T.M. (2014), An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design, Springer, London, UK.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Xie, Y. and Zhao, M. (2015), “A new model of conceptual design based on Scientific Ontology and intentionality theory”, Part 1: The conceptual foundation, Design Studies, Vol. 37, pp. 12–36.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Xie, Y. and Zhao, M. (2015), “A new model of conceptual design based on Scientific Ontology and intentionality theory”, Part 2: The conceptual foundation, Design Studies, Vol. 38, pp. 139–160.Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2007), “Editorial Forty years of design research”, Design Studies, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Curry, T. (2014), “A theoretical basis for recommending the use of design methodologies as teaching strategies in the design studio”, Design Studies, Vol. 35, pp. 632–646.Google Scholar
Dorst, K. (2016), “Design practice and design research: finally together?”, Proceedings DRS 2016, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
Eisenbart, B., Gericke, K. and Blessing, L.T.M. (2017), “Taking a look at the utilisation of function models in interdisciplimary design: insights from ten engineering companies”, Research in Engineering design, Vol. 28, pp. 299–331.Google Scholar
Habraken, N.J. (2005), Paladio's Children, Taylor & Francis, New York, US.Google Scholar
Hubka, V. and Eder, W.E. (2001), Design Science, edited for the WWW by Salustri, F. A., http://deseng.ryerson.ca/DesignScience/3.html#3.1.2.Google Scholar
Kannengiesser, U. and Gero, J.S. (2017), “Can Pahl and Beitz’ systematic approach be a predictive model of designing?” Design Science, Vol. 3, p. e24 journals.cambridge.org/dsj http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.24.Google Scholar
Kroonenberg, H.H. van den (1988), “Stimulating creativity and innovations by methodical design”, In Creativity and Innovation: towards a European Network, Springer, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Leon, M., Laing, R., Malins, J. and Salman, H. (2014), “Development and testing of a design protocol for computer mediated multidisciplinary collaboration during the concept stages with application to the built environment”, Proceedings DDSS 2014, Procedia Environmental Sciences Vol. 22, pp. 108–119.Google Scholar
Lloyd, P. (2017), “Fro, Design Methods to Future-Focused Thinking: 250 years of design research”, Design Studies, Vol. 48, pp. A1–A8.Google Scholar
Le Masson, P., Dorst, K. and Subrahamanian, E. (2013), “Special issue on design Theory: history, state of the arts and advancements”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 212–243.Google Scholar
Le Masson, P., Weill, B. and Hatchuel, A. (2017), Design Theory, Springer.Google Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.H. (2007), Engineering Design, A Systematic Approach, third edition, Wallace, K. and Blessing, L. translators and editors, Springer.Google Scholar
Plowright, P.D. (2014), Revealing Architectural Design: Methods, Frameworks & Tools, Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
Savanović, P. (2009), “Integral design method in the context of sustainable building design”, PhD thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Verheijden, D-J. (2008), Methodisch ontwerpen, van probleem tot innovatief concepts, reader Fontys, Eindhoven, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Zeiler, W. (2007), “Methodical Design 1972-2006: A historical Overview about a Design Model”, Design Principles and Practices, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Zeiler, W. and Savanovic, P. (2009), “General systems theory based Integral Design method”, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design ICED 09, 24–27 August 2009, Stanford, US.Google Scholar
Zeiler, W. (2015), “Integral design: the new roles for architect and engineers for developing nearly zero energy buildings”, Int. J. Innovation and Sustainable Development, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 137–156.Google Scholar
Zeiler, W. (2017), Design Handbook, A methodical framework, Noordhoff Uitgevers, Groningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar