Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:44:06.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Young open clusters in the Milky Way and Small Magellanic Cloud

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

C. Martayan
C. Martayan*
Affiliation:
European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile email: [email protected] GEPI, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, Université Paris Diderot, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon Cedex, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

NGC 6611, Trumpler 14, Trumpler 15, Trumpler 16, and Collinder 232 are very young open clusters located in star-formation regions in the Eagle Nebula and Carina in the Milky Way, and NGC 346 in the Small Magellanic Cloud. With different instrumentation and techniques, it has been possible to detect and classify new Herbig Ae/Be and classical Be stars and to provide new tests/comparisons of the Be stars' appearance models. Special (He-strong) stars in these star-formation regions are also discussed.

Keywords

open clusters and associations: individual (Trumpler 14, Trumpler 15, Trumpler 16, Collinder 232)Magellanic Cloudsgalaxies: star clustersstars: early-typestars: pre–main-sequencestars: emission-lineBestars: evolutiondustextinction
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S266: Star clusters: basic galactic building blocks throughout time and space , August 2009 , pp. 466 - 469
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Alecian, E., et al. 2008, A&A (Letters), 481, L99Google Scholar
Baade, D., et al. 1999, ESO Messenger, 95, 15Google Scholar
Frémat, Y., Neiner, C., Hubert, A.-M., Floquet, M., Zorec, J., Janot–Pacheco, E., & Renan de Medeiros, J. 2006, A&A, 451, 1053Google Scholar
Herbig, G. H. 1975, ApJ, 196, 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, J., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Briceño, C., Sicilia–Aguilar, A., & Berlind, P. 2005, AJ, 129, 856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubeny, I. & Lanz, T. 1995, ApJ, 439, 875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martayan, C., Floquet, M., Hubert, A. M., Neiner, C., Frémat, Y., Baade, D., & Fabregat, J. 2008, A&A, 489, 459Google Scholar
Martayan, C., Baade, D., & Fabregat, J. 2009, A&A, in press (arXiv:0909.2303)Google Scholar
Momany, Y., et al. 2001, A&A, 379, 436Google Scholar
Pasquini, L., et al. 2002, ESO Messenger, 110, 1Google Scholar
Schaller, G., Schaerer, D., Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 1992, A&AS, 96, 269Google Scholar