Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:31:39.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray studies of the black widow pulsar PSR B1957+20

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2013

R. H. H. Huang
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy and Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan email: [email protected]
A. K. H. Kong
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy and Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan email: [email protected]
J. Takata
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
C. Y. Hui
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
L. C. C. Lin
Affiliation:
General Education Center of China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
K. S. Cheng
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We report on Chandra observations of the black widow pulsar, PSR B1957+20. Evidence for a binary-phase dependence of the X-ray emission from the pulsar is found with a deep observation. The binary-phase resolved spectral analysis reveals non-thermal X-ray emission of PSR B1957+20, confirming the results of previous studies. This suggests that the X-rays are mostly due to intra-binary shock emission which is strongest when the pulsar wind interacts with the ablated material from the companion star. The geometry of the peak emission is determined in our study. The marginal softening of the spectrum of the non-thermal X-ray tail may indicate that particles injected at the termination shock is dominated by synchrotron cooling.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Alpar, M. A., Cheng, A. F., Ruderman, M. A., & Shaham, J. 1982, Nature, 300, 728Google Scholar
Fruchter, A. S., Stinebring, D. R., & Taylor, J. H. 1988, Nature, 333, 237Google Scholar
Guillemot, L., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 33Google Scholar
Huang, H. H. & Becker, W. 2007, A&A, 463, L5Google Scholar
Kulkarni, S. R. & Hester, J. J. 1988, Nature, 335, 801Google Scholar
Stappers, B. W., Gaensler, B. M., Kaspi, V. M., van der Klis, M., & Lewin, W. H. G. 2003, Science, 299, 1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar