Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:00:31.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-ray Grating Observations of Recent Recurrent Novae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2013

Marina Orio ,
Ehud Behar ,
J. Gallagher ,
A. Bianchini ,
E. Chiosi ,
J. Luna ,
T. Nelson  and
T. Rauch
Marina Orio
Affiliation:
INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, vicolo Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, Italy email: [email protected] Dept. of Astronomy, 475 N. Charter Str., Madison WI 53706
Ehud Behar
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Technion, Kiryat Hatechnion, Haifa, Israel
J. Gallagher
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy, 475 N. Charter Str., Madison WI 53706
A. Bianchini
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department, Padova University, vicolo dell' Osservatorio 3, I-35122 Padova, Italy
E. Chiosi
Affiliation:
INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, vicolo Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, Italy email: [email protected]
J. Luna
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias Astronómicas, de la Tierra y del Espacio (ICATE/FCEFyN), Av.España Sur 1512, J5402DSP, San Juan, Argentina
T. Nelson
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, 116 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455
T. Rauch
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy & Astrophysics, Kepler Center for Astro & Particle Physics, Eberhard Karls University, Sand 1, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two recurrent novae (RNe) that do not host red giants were observed in outburst at the beginning of 2009 and 2010, respectively. The first nova was LMC 2009a, and the second one was U Scorpii. Nova LMC 2009a was a relatively slow RN, and it was quite luminous both at optical and X-ray wavelengths. U Sco is the fastest nova ever recorded. Its supersoft X-ray phase started a couple of weeks after optical maximum and lasted for about a month, while for Nova LMC 2009a this phase started four months after maximum and lasted for 5 months. For both novae, the first X-ray spectrum taken while the luminous supersoft X-ray source was beginning to emerge is remarkably similar with broad and prominent emission lines of nitrogen and carbon accounting for at least 30% of the X-ray flux. Blue-shifted absorption and red-shifted emission form apparent P-Cyg profiles. We attribute the emission features to the ejecta and show evidence that they are largely due to collisional ionization. In the case of U Sco the absorption lines were embedded in the emission features after the first observation. We find evidence that in U Scorpii we were observing the Thomson reflected spectrum at a distance of ≃ 3 R⊙ from the white dwarf rather than the atmosphere itself. For both novae, the peak temperature was remarkably high, probably close to 900,000 K for U Sco, and about 600,000 K for Nova LMC 2009a. We suggest that these two objects represent different stages of RNe secular evolution.

Keywords

stars: novaecataclysmic variableswindsoutflowsindividual (U Scorpii, Nova LMC 2009a)white dwarfs — X-rays: binariesindividual (U Scorpii, Nova LMC 2009a)
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 7 , Issue S281: Binary Paths to Type Ia Supernovae Explosions , July 2011 , pp. 181 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Anupama, G. C. & Dewangan, G. C. 2000, AJ, 119, 1359Google Scholar
Barlow, M. J., et al. 1981, MNRAS, 195, 61Google Scholar
Brinkman, A. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 530, L111Google Scholar
Liller, W. 2009, IAUC 9019Google Scholar
Nelson, T., et al. 2008, ApJ, 673, 1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ness, J.-U., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1015Google Scholar
Ness, J.-U., et al. 2010, ATel 2477Google Scholar
Nelson, T., Orio, M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 673, 1067Google Scholar
Orio, M., Ebisawa, K., Heise, J., & Hartmann, J. 2003, RMXAA, 610, 194Google Scholar
Ness, J-U., Brickhouse, N. S., Drake, J. J., & Huenemoerder, D. P. 2003, ApJ, 598, 1289Google Scholar
Ness, J-U., Brickhouse, N. S., Drake, J. J., & Huenemoerder, D. P. 2003, ApJ, 598, 1289Google Scholar
Rauch, T., Orio, M., Gonzales-Riestra, R., Nelson, T., Still, M., Werner, K., & Wilms, J. 2010, ApJ, 717, 363Google Scholar
Schaefer, B. E. & Ringwald, F. A. 1995, ApJ, 447, L45Google Scholar
Schaefer, B., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 925CrossRefGoogle Scholar