Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:05:47.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why is the Red Rectangle Unique?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2014

H. Van Winckel
H. Van Winckel*
Affiliation:
Instituut voor Sterrenkunde, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200D, 3001 Leuven, Belgium email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Red Rectangle is a spectacular bipolar nebula centred around the eccentric evolved binary HD 44179. The nebula is rich in spectral signatures: it is the brightest source of the Extended Red Emission (ERE), of the Blue Luminescence (BL) as well as one of the brightest sources of mid-IR PAH bands. Moreover, and unique to this source, a plethora of narrow emission lines is detected on top of the diffuse ERE. Some of these molecular features show rotational contours which become narrower at larger angular separation from the central engine. Some converge to wavelengths and profiles of narrow DIBs. All these observations show that the Red Rectangle is a very rich laboratory to study active astrochemical processes within the nebula. We also address, but fail to answer, the question why this source is so unique among the many observed post-AGB binary analogues.

Keywords

stars: individual (HD 44179)stars: AGB and post-AGBISM: moleculesastrochemistry(stars:) binaries: spectroscopic(stars:) circumstellar matter(ISM:) reflection nebulae
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Symposium S297: The Diffuse Interstellar Bands , May 2013 , pp. 180 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Balm, S. P. & Jura, M. 1992, A&A, 261, L25Google Scholar
Bujarrabal, V., Castro-Carrizo, A., Alcolea, J., & Neri, R. 2005, A&A, 441, 1031Google Scholar
Bujarrabal, V., Alcolea, J., Van Winckel, H., Santander-Garcia, M., & Castro-Carrizo, A. 2013, 557, A104Google Scholar
Bujarrabal, V., Castro-Carrizo, A., Alcolea, J., Van Winckel, H., Sánchez Contreras, C., Santancer-García, M., Neri, R., & Lucas, R. 2013, A&A Letters 557, L11Google Scholar
Cohen, M., Van Winckel, H., Bond, H. E., & Gull, T. R. 2004, AJ, 127, 2362Google Scholar
de Ruyter, S., van Winckel, H., Maas, T., Lloyd Evans, T., Waters, L. B. F. M., & Dejonghe, H. 2006, A&A, 448, 641Google Scholar
Gielen, C., Van Winckel, H., Reyniers, M., et al. 2009, A&A, 508, 1391Google Scholar
Gielen, C., Bouwman, J., Van Winckel, H., Lloyd Evans, T., Woods, P. M., Kemper, F., Marengo, M., Meixner, M., Sloan, G. C., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2011, A&A, 533, A99Google Scholar
Giridhar, S., Lambert, D. L., Reddy, B. E., Gonzalez, G., & Yong, D. 2005, ApJ, 627, 432Google Scholar
Gledhill, T. M., Witt, A. N., Vijh, U. P., & Davis, C. J. 2009, MNRAS 392, 1217Google Scholar
Glinski, R. J. & Anderson, C. M. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 17Google Scholar
Gorlova, N., Van Winckel, H., Gielen, C., Raskin, G., Prins, S., Pessemier, W., Waelkens, C., Fremat, Y., Hensberge, H., Dumortier, L., Jorissen, A., & Van Eck, S. 2012, A&A, 542, A26Google Scholar
Jura, M., Turner, J., & Balm, S. P 1997, ApJ, 474, 741Google Scholar
Kamath, D. & Wood, P. R., Van, Winckel 2013, MNRAS, in pressGoogle Scholar
Maas, T., Van Winckel, H., & Lloyd Evans, T. 2005, A&A, 429, 297Google Scholar
Men'shchikov, A. B., Schertl, D., Tuthill, P. G., Weigelt, G., & Yungelson, L. R. 2002, A&A 393, 867Google Scholar
Reyniers, M. & van Winckel, H. 2007, A&A, 463, L1Google Scholar
Sarre, P. J., Miles, J. R., & Scarrott, S. M. 1995, Science, 269, 647Google Scholar
Schmidt, G. D., Cohen, M., & Margon, B. 1980, ApJ, 239, 133Google Scholar
ThomasJ, D. J, D., Witt, A. N., Aufdenberg, J., Bjorkman, J. E., Dahlstrom, J., Hobbs, L. M., & York, D. G. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Aarle, E., Van Winckel, H., Lloyd Evans, T., Ueta, T., Wood, P. R., & Ginsburg, A. G. 2011, A&A, 530, 90Google Scholar
Van Winckel, H. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 391Google Scholar
Van Winckel, H., Cohen, M., & Gull, T. R. 2002, A&A, 390, 147Google Scholar
Van Winckel, H., Waelkens, C., & Waters, L. B. F. M. 1995, A&A, 293, 25Google Scholar
Van Winckel, H., Lloyd Evans, T., Briquet, M., et al. 2009, A&A 505, 1221Google Scholar
Vijh, U. P., Witt, Adolf N., & Gordon, K. D. 2004, ApJ, 606, 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waelkens, C., Van Winckel, H., Trams, N. R., & Waters, L. B. F. M. 1992, A&A, 256, 15Google Scholar
Waelkens, C., Van Winckel, H., Waters, L. B. F. M., & Bakker, E. J. 1996, A&A, 314, 17Google Scholar
Waters, L. B. F. M., Cami, J., de Jong, T., Molster, F. J.et al. 1998, Nature 391, 868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, L. B. F. M., Trams, N. R. & Waelkens, C 1992, A&A, 262, 37Google Scholar
Wehres, N., Romanzin, C., Linnartz, H., Van Winckel, H., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2010, A&A, 518, 36Google Scholar
Wehres, N., Linnartz, H., van Winckel, H., & Tielens, A. G. G. M., 2011, A&A 533, 28Google Scholar
Witt, A. N., Vijh, U. P., Hobbs, L. M., Aufdenberg, J. P., Thorburn, J. A., & York, D. G. 2009, ApJ, 693, 1946Google Scholar