Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:43:19.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What makes a galaxy radio-loud?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2012

R. A. Ortega-Minakata
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Guanajuato, C.P. 36000, Guanajuato, Mexico email: [email protected]
J. P. Torres-Papaqui
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Guanajuato, C.P. 36000, Guanajuato, Mexico email: [email protected]
H. Andernach
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Guanajuato, C.P. 36000, Guanajuato, Mexico email: [email protected]
R. Coziol
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Guanajuato, C.P. 36000, Guanajuato, Mexico email: [email protected]
J. M. Islas-Islas
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Guanajuato, C.P. 36000, Guanajuato, Mexico email: [email protected]
I. Plauchu-Frayn
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC), E-18008, Granada, Spain
D. M. Neri-Larios
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Guanajuato, C.P. 36000, Guanajuato, Mexico email: [email protected]
M. del C. Rojas-Granados
Affiliation:
División de Ingenierías, Universidad de Guanajuato, C.P. 36885, Salamanca, Mexico
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We compare the Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) of radio-loud and radio-quiet AGNs in three different samples observed with SDSS: radio-loud AGNs (RLAGNs), Low Luminosity AGNs (LLAGNs) and AGNs in isolated galaxies (IG-AGNs). All these galaxies have similar optical spectral characteristics. The median SED of the RLAGNs is consistent with the characteristic SED of quasars, while that of the LLAGNs and IG-AGNs are consistent with the SED of LINERs, with a lower luminosity in the IG-AGNs than in the LLAGNs. We infer the masses of the black holes (BHs) from the bulge masses. These increase from the IG-AGNs to the LLAGNs and are highest for the RLAGNs. All these AGNs show accretion rates near or slightly below 10% of the Eddington limit, the differences in luminosity being solely due to different BH masses. Our results suggests there are two types of AGNs, radio quiet and radio loud, differing only by the mass of their bulges or BHs.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Coziol, R., Torres-Papaqui, J. P., Plauchu-Frayn, I., et al. 2011, Rev. Mexicana AyA, 47, 361Google Scholar
Elvis, M., Wilkes, B. J., McDowell, J. C., et al. 1994, ApJS, 95, 1Google Scholar
Häring, N. & Rix, H-W. 2004, ApJ, 604, L89.Google Scholar
Lin, Y.-T., Shen, Y., Strauss, M. A., Richards, G. T., & Lunnan, R. 2010, ApJ, 123, 1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, B. M., Bentz, M. C., Desroches, L.-B., et al. 2005, ApJ, 632, 799Google Scholar
Torres-Papaqui, J. P., Coziol, R., Andernach, H., et al. 2011, MNRAS, submittedGoogle Scholar
Younes, G., Porquet, D., Sabra, B., et al. 2010, A&A, 517, A33.Google Scholar