Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:16:46.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What have we learned from large spectroscopic surveys?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Michael R. Blanton
Michael R. Blanton*
Affiliation:
Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics, Department of Physics, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An essential use of stellar population synthesis methods is to interpret the observations of galaxies, to infer their star-formation and assembly histories. I describe here some of the uses of these techniques over the past few years, primarily in the context of local galaxy redshift surveys. For this purpose, such surveys have both advantages and disadvantages relative to higher signal-to-noise but smaller studies, which I discuss. After discussing general issues, I describe how the substantial model uncertainties impact the analysis of galaxy spectra. Then, I discuss the special case of elliptical galaxies, arguing that investigators have made interesting discoveries even in the absence of perfect (or even good) models. I then describe the desiderata for massive higher redshift surveys and the trade-offs that must be made between cosmological and galaxy-focused science, in qualitative terms.

Keywords

galaxies: statisticsgalaxies: stellar contentgalaxies: fundamental parameters
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S262: Stellar Populations – Planning for the Next Decade , August 2009 , pp. 195 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Bacon, R. et al. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldry, I. K., Glazebrook, K., & Driver, S. P. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 945Google Scholar
Balogh, M. L., Schade, D., Morris, S. L., Yee, H. K. C., Carlberg, R. G., & Ellingson, E. 1998, ApJ, 504, L75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E. et al. 2009, Astro2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, 2010, 106Google Scholar
Bernardi, M., Nichol, R. C., Sheth, R. K., Miller, C. J., & Brinkmann, J. 2006, AJ, 131, 1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, M. R. & Moustakas, J. 2009, Annual Review of Astronomy & Astrophysics, 47, 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, M. R. & Roweis, S. 2007, AJ, 133, 734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, M. R. et al. 2003 a, ApJ, 594, 186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, M. R. et al. 2003 b, ApJ, 592, 819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, A. S., Treu, T., Koopmans, L. V. E., Gavazzi, R., Moustakas, L. A., Burles, S., Schlegel, D. J., & Wayth, R. 2008, ApJ, 684, 248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bregman, J. N., Temi, P., & Bregman, J. D. 2006, ApJ, 647, 265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressan, A., Panuzzo, P., Buson, L., Clemens, M., Granato, G. L., Rampazzo, R., Silva, L., Valdes, J. R., Vega, O., & Danese, L. 2006, ApJL, 639, L55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruzual, A. G. 2007, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints (astro-ph/0702091)Google Scholar
Cappellari, M. et al. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, A. J., Szalay, A. S., Bershady, M. A., Kinney, A. L., & Calzetti, D. 1995, AJ, 110, 1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E., & White, M. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 699, 486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. et al. 2003, in Discoveries and Research Prospects from 6- to 10-Meter-Class Telescopes II. Edited by Guhathakurta, Puragra. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 4834, pp. 161-172 (2003)., 161–172Google Scholar
Fan, X. et al. 2001, AJ, 121, 54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallazzi, A., Charlot, S., Brinchmann, J., & White, S. D. M. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, G. J., Faber, S. M., & Schiavon, R. P. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 693, 486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffmann, G. et al. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maraston, C. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padmanabhan, N. et al. 2004, New Astronomy, 9, 329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padmanabhan, N. et al. 2008, ApJ, 674, 1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panter, B., Jimenez, R., Heavens, A. F., & Charlot, S. 2008, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 391, 1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, R. N., Lah, P., Forbes, D. A., Colless, M., & Couch, W. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 1781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichardt, C., Jimenez, R., & Heavens, A. F. 2001, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 327, 849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, R. M. et al. 1997, Astrophysical Journal Letters v.484, 484, L25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schawinski, K. et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechter, P. 1976, ApJ, 203, 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiavon, R. P. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 171, 146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D., Maraston, C., Bender, R., & Mendes de Oliveira, C. 2005, ApJ, 621, 673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinsley, B. M. 1980, Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics, 5, 287Google Scholar
Tojeiro, R., Wilkins, S., Heavens, A. F., Panter, B., & Jimenez, R. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement, 185, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trager, S. C., Faber, S. M., & Dressler, A. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trager, S. C., Faber, S. M., Worthey, G., & González, J. J. 2000, AJ, 120, 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trujillo, I., Burkert, A., & Bell, E. F. 2004, ApJL, 600, L39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dokkum, P. G. 2008, ApJ, 674, 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderplas, J. & Connolly, A. 2009, The Astronomical Journal, 138, 1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vila-Costas, M. B. & Edmunds, M. G. 1992, MNRAS, 259, 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthey, G. 1998, PASP, 110, 888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
York, D. G. et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaritsky, D., Kennicutt, R. C., & Huchra, J. P. 1994, ApJ, 420, 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar