Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:55:27.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What can pre-solar grains tell us about AGB stars?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Maria A. Lugaro
Affiliation:
Sterrenkundig Instituut, University of Utrecht, Postbus 80000, NL-3508TA, Utrecht, the Netherlands email: [email protected]
Susanne Höfner
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy & Space Physics, Uppsala University, Box 515, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The vast majority of pre-solar grains recovered to date show the signature of an origin in asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars. In AGB stars, the abundances of elements lighter than silicon and heavier than iron are largely affected by proton- and neutron-capture processes, respectively, while the compositions of the elements in between also carry the signature of the initial composition of the star. Dust is produced and observed around AGB stars and the strong mass loss experienced by these stars is believed to be driven by radiation pressure on dust grains. We briefly review the main developments that have occurred in the past few years in the study of AGB stars in relation to dust and pre-solar grains. From the nucleosynthesis point of view these include: more stringent constraints on the main neutron source nucleus, 13C, for the slow neutron capture process (the s process); the possibility of pre-solar grains coming from massive AGB stars; and the unique opportunity to infer the ‘isotopic’ evolution of the Galaxy by combining pre-solar grain data and AGB model predictions. Concerning the formation of grains in AGB stars, considerable progress has been achieved in modelling. In particular, self-consistent models for atmospheres and winds of C-stars have reached a level of sophistication which allows direct quantitative comparison with observations. In the case of stars with C/O < 1, however, recent work points to serious problems with the dust-driven wind scenario. A current trend in atmosphere and wind modelling is to investigate the possible effects of inhomogenieties (e.g., due to giant convection cells) with 2D/3D models.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Andersen, A. C., Höfner, S., & Gautschy-Loidl, R. 2003, A&A, 400, 981Google Scholar
Barzyk, J. G., Savina, M. R., Davis, A. M., Gallino, R., Pellin, M. J., Lewis, R. S., Amari, S., & Clayton, R. N. 2006, Lunar and Planetary Science XXXVII, abstract 1999Google Scholar
Bonačić Marinović, A., Izzard, R. G., Lugaro, M., & Pols, O. R. 2007, A&A, 469, 1013Google Scholar
Busso, M., Gallino, R., Lambert, D. L., Travaglio, C., & Smith, V. V. 2001, ApJ, 557, 802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freytag, B., & Höfner, S. 2003, AN, 324, Suppl. Issue 3, 173Google Scholar
Freytag, B., & Höfner, S. 2006, A&A, to be submittedGoogle Scholar
Gautschy-Loidl, R., Höfner, S., Jørgensen, U. G., & Hron, J. 2004, A&A, 422, 289Google Scholar
Höfner, S. 2005, in: Favata, F. et al. (eds.), Proc. of 13th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems and the Sun, ESA SP-560, p. 335Google Scholar
Höfner, S. 2006, in: Kerschbaum, F., Charbonnel, C. & Wing, R. (eds.), Why Galaxies Care About AGB Stars, ASP-CS, 378, in pressGoogle Scholar
Höfner, S., Gautschy-Loidl, R., Aringer, B., & Jørgensen, U. G. 2003, A&A, 399, 589Google Scholar
Jäger, C., Mutschke, H., & Henning, Th. 1998, A&A, 332, 291Google Scholar
Jeong, K. S., Winters, J. M., Le Bertre, T., & Sedlmayr, E. 2003, A&A, 407, 191Google Scholar
Lugaro, M., Davis, A. M., Gallino, R., Pellin, M. J., Straniero, O., & Käppeler, F. 2003, ApJ, 593, 486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugaro, M., Karakas, A. I., Nittler, L. R., Alexander, C. M. O'. D., Hoppe, P., Iliadis, C., & Lattanzio, J. C. 2007, A&A 461, 657Google Scholar
Nowotny, W., Aringer, B., Höfner, S., Gautschy-Loidl, R., & Windsteig, W. 2005a, A&A, 437, 273Google Scholar
Nowotny, W., Lebzelter, T., Hron, J., & Höfner, S. 2005b, A&A, 437, 285Google Scholar
Timmes, F. X., & Clayton, D. D. 1996, ApJ, 472, 723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woitke, P. 2003, in: Piskunov, N. E., Weiss, W. W. & Gray, D. F. (eds.), Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, IAU Symposium No. 210 (San Francisco: ASP), p. 387Google Scholar
Woitke, P. 2006a, A&A 452, 537Google Scholar
Woitke, P. 2006b, in: Kerschbaum, F., Charbonnel, C. & Wing, R. (eds.), Why Galaxies Care About AGB Stars, ASP-CS, 378, in pressGoogle Scholar
Zinner, E., Nittler, L. R., Gallino, R., Karakas, A. I., Lugaro, M., Straniero, O., & Lattanzio, J. C. 2006, ApJ 650, 350CrossRefGoogle Scholar