Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:51:31.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Various scenarios for the equatorward migration of sunspots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2020

Detlef Elstner Open the ORCID record for Detlef Elstner [Opens in a new window] ,
Yori Fournier  and
Rainer Arlt
Detlef Elstner
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany email: mailto:[email protected]
Yori Fournier
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany email: mailto:[email protected]
Rainer Arlt
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany email: mailto:[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The profile of the differential rotation together with the sign of the alpha-effect determine the dynamo wave direction. In early models of the solar dynamo the dynamo wave often leads to a poleward migration of the activity belts. Flux transport by the meridional flow or the effect of the surface shear layer are possible solutions. In a model including the corona, we show that various migrations can be obtained by varying the properties of the corona. A new dynamo of Babcock-Leighton type also leads to the correct equatorward migration by the non-linear relation between flux density and rise time of the flux.

Keywords

solar dynamosolar corona
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 15 , Symposium S354: Solar and Stellar Magnetic Fields: Origins and Manifestations , June 2019 , pp. 134 - 137
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Bonanno, A., Elstner, D., Rüdiger, G. 2002, A&A, 390, 673Google Scholar
Bonanno, A. 2016, ApJ, 833, L22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhuri, A. R., Schüssler, M., Dikpati, M. 1995, A&A, 303, L29Google Scholar
Dikpati, M. & Charbonneau, P. 1999, ApJ, 518, 508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournier, Y., Arlt, R., Elstner, D. 2018, A&A, 620, 135Google Scholar
Hathaway, D. H. 2010, LRSP, 7, 1Google Scholar
Warnecke, J., Käpylä, P. J., Mantere, M. J., Brandenburg, A. 2013, ApJ,. 778, 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnecke, J., Käpylä, P. J., Käpylä, M. J., Brandenburg, A. 2016, A&A, 596, A115Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Elstner et al. supplementary material

Elstner et al. supplementary material

Download Elstner et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 6.8 MB