Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T21:19:16.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using N-body simulations to understand the chemo-dynamical evolution of the inner Milky Way

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2018

E. Athanassoula
E. Athanassoula*
Affiliation:
Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LAM, Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille, Marseille, France email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I present examples of how chemo-dynamical N-body simulations can help understanding the structure and evolution of the inner Galaxy. Such simulations reproduce the observed links between kinematics, morphology and chemistry in the bar/bulge region and explain them by the self-consistent cohabitation of a number of components. Galactic archaeology, applied to simulation snapshots, explains the sequence in which the stars of the various components were formed. The thick disc stars form earlier than those of the thin disc and in a much shorter time scale. The bar in the thick disc is horizontally thicker than that of the thin disc and has a different vertical morphology. The Galaxy’s inner disc scalelength is much smaller than what is expected from nearby galaxies of similar stellar mass.

Keywords

Galaxy: bulgeGalaxy: stellar contentGalaxy: structureGalaxy: kinematics and dynamicsGalaxy: evolutiongalaxies: structure — galaxies: kinematics and dynamics — galaxies:spiral — galaxies:evolution — galaxies:evolution
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 13 , Symposium S334: Rediscovering our Galaxy , July 2017 , pp. 65 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Athanassoula, E. 1983, in Athanassoula, E. (ed.), Internal kinematics and dynamics of galaxies, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., p. 243Google Scholar
Athanassoula, E., 2002, ApJ, 569L, 83Google Scholar
Athanassoula, E., 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1179Google Scholar
Athanassoula, E. 2013, in Falcón-Barroso, J. and Knapen, J. H. (eds.), Secular Evolution of Galaxies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 305Google Scholar
Athanassoula, E., Bosma, A., & Papaioannou, S., 1987, A&A, 179, 23Google Scholar
Athanassoula, E., Rodionov, S., Peschken, N., & Lambert, J. C. 2016, ApJ, 821, 90 (A16)Google Scholar
Athanassoula, E., Rodionov, S., & Prantzos, N. 2017, MNRAS, 467L, 46 (A17)Google Scholar
Aumer, M., & White, S. 2013 MNRAS, 428, 1055Google Scholar
Aumer, M., Binney, J., & Schönrich, R., 2016, MNRAS, 459, 3326Google Scholar
Babusiaux, C., 2016, Publ. Astr. Soc. Autralia, 33, 26Google Scholar
Bekki, K. & Tsujimoto, T., 2011, MNRAS, 416, 60LGoogle Scholar
Bland-Hawthorn, J. & Gerhard, O., 2016, ARA&A, 54, 529Google Scholar
Chiappini, C., Matteucci, F., & Gratton, R., 1997, ApJ, 477, 765Google Scholar
Debattista, V., Ness, M., Gonzalez, O., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 1587Google Scholar
Efremov, , 2011, Astr. Rep., 55, 108Google Scholar
Fragkoudi, F., Di Matteo, P., Haywood, M. et al. 2017, arXiv170400734Google Scholar
Freeman, K. C., Ness, M., Wylie-de-Boer, E., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 3660Google Scholar
Georgelin, Y. M., Georgelin, Y. P., 1976, A&A, 49, 57Google Scholar
Laine, J., Laurikainen, E., & Salo, H., 2014, A&A, 596, A25Google Scholar
Laurikainen, E., Salo, H., Buta, R., & Knapen, J., 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1452Google Scholar
Majewski, S., Schiavon, R, Frincaboy, P., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 94Google Scholar
Martig, M., Minchev, I., & Flynn, C., 2014, MNRAS, 442, 2474Google Scholar
Minchev, I. 2017, arXiv170107034Google Scholar
Ness, M., Freeman, K. C., Athanassoula, E., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 2092Google Scholar
Radburn-Smith, D. J., Roskar, R., Debattista, V. P., et al., 2012, ApJ, 753, 138Google Scholar
Rodionov, S., Athanassoula, E., & Peschken, N., 2017, A&A, 600, A25Google Scholar
Salo, H., Laurikainen, E., Laine, J., et al. 2015, ApJS, 219, 4Google Scholar
Sheth, K., Regan, M., Hinz, J. L., et al., 2010, PASP, 122, 1397Google Scholar
Toomre, A. 1981, in Fall, S.M. and Lynden-Bell, D. (eds.), The structure and evolution of normal galaxies, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 111Google Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, G. & Pence, W. D., 1978, AJ, 83, 1163Google Scholar
Wegg, C., Gerhard, O., & Portail, M., 2015, MNRAS, 450, 4050Google Scholar
Zasowski, G., Ness, M., García Pérez, A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 832, 132Google Scholar