Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:37:05.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tracing the Origin of Bars and Bulges through the Study of their Stellar and Ionised Gas Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Isabel Pérez
Affiliation:
Dep. Física Teórica y del Cosmos, Campus de Fuentenueva, Universidad de Granada, Spain Instituto Carlos I de Física Teórica y Computación, Spain
Patricia Sánchez-Blázquez
Affiliation:
Dep. Física Teórica, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049, Madrid, Spain
Almudena Zurita
Affiliation:
Dep. Física Teórica y del Cosmos, Campus de Fuentenueva, Universidad de Granada, Spain Instituto Carlos I de Física Teórica y Computación, Spain
Estrella Florido
Affiliation:
Dep. Física Teórica y del Cosmos, Campus de Fuentenueva, Universidad de Granada, Spain Instituto Carlos I de Física Teórica y Computación, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have carried out a detailed analysis of stellar properties of bars and bulges of a sample of early-type galaxies. We have also compared the results of the bulge properties with the bulges of a similar sample of unbarred galaxies, deriving the SSP equivalent stellar parameters in the same way as for our sample. We are currently characterising the nebular gas in the bulges of the sample galaxies. We have found differences in the bulge stellar population properties between barred and unbarred galaxies. The bulges of barred galaxies seem to be more metal rich, at a given velocity dispersion (σ), than the bulges of unbarred galaxies, as measured by some metallicity sensitive indices. There are indications that the ratio of relative abundance of alpha-elements with respect to iron, [E/Fe], derived for the bulges of barred galaxies tend to lie above the values of the unbarred galaxies at a given σ. We also find three different types of bars according to their metallicity and age distribution along the radius: 1) Bars with negative metallicity gradients. They show mean young/intermediate population (<2 Gyr), and have amongst the lowest stellar maximum central velocity dispersion of the sample. 2) Bars with null metallicity gradients. These galaxies that do not show any gradient in their metallicity distribution along the bar and have negative age gradients (i.e younger populations at the bar end). 3) Bars with positive metallicity gradients, i.e. more metal rich at the bar ends. These galaxies are predominantly those with higher velocity dispersion and older mean population. We find no significant correlation between the age and metallicity distribution, and bar/galaxy parameters such as the AGN presence, size or the bar strength. From the kinematics, we find that all the galaxies show a disk–like central component. Regarding the ionised gas properties, we find that the nebular metallicity gradients are shallower than the stellar ones, indicating an efficient mixing of the material currently forming. The nebular central metallicities do not show a correlation with the central σ, and, furthermore, in some cases the nebular metallicities are clearly lower than the stellar ones, indicating an external origin for the gas fueling the current star formation. All these results point to a scenario, at least for early-type galaxies, where bars are long-lived and where the formation of the bulge and the bar are closely linked. Later accretion of gas can then be funneled towards the center forming nuclear discs and rings, producing substructures with low level of star formation, but that would not contain enough stars to produce a change in the SSP-equivalent metallicities and [E/Fe].

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Berentzen, I., Athanassoula, E., Heller, C. H., & Fricke, K. J. 2004, MNRAS, 347, 220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emsellem, E., Greusard, D., Combes, F., et al. 2001, A&A, 368, 52Google Scholar
Michel-Dansac, L. & Wozniak, H. 2006, A&A, 452, 97Google Scholar
Moorthy, B. & Holtzman, J. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serra, P. & Trager, S. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 769Google Scholar
Peirani, S., Hammer, F., Flores, H., Yang, Y., & Athanassoula, E. 2009, A&A, 496, 51Google Scholar
Pérez, I., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., & Zurita, A. 2007, A&A, 465, 9Google Scholar
Pérez, I., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., & Zurita, A. 2009, A&A, 495, 775Google Scholar
Pérez, I. & Freeman, K. 2006, A&A, 454, 165Google Scholar
Wozniak, H. & Champavert, N. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wozniak, H., Combes, F., Emsellem, E., & Friedli, D. 2003, A&A, 409, 469Google Scholar