Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:30:49.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards Realistic Understandings of Gas Dynamics in Protoplanetary Disks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2020

Xue-Ning Bai Open the ORCID record for Xue-Ning Bai [Opens in a new window]
Xue-Ning Bai*
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Study and Center for Astrophysics, Tsinghua University Beijing100084, China email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The gas dynamics of protoplanetary disks (PPDs) plays a crucial role in almost all stages of planet formation, yet it is far from being well understood largely due to the complex interplay among various microphysical processes. Primarily, PPD gas dynamics is likely governed by magnetic fields, and their coupling with the weakly ionized gas is described by non-ideal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) effects. Incorporating these effects, I will present the first fully global simulations of PPDs that include the most realistic disk microphysics. Accretion and disk evolution is primarily driven by magnetized disk winds with significant mass loss comparable to accretion rate. The overall disk gas dynamics strongly depends on the polarity of large-scale poloidal magnetic field threading the disk owing to the Hall effect. The flow structure in the disk is highly unconventional with major implications on planet formation.

Keywords

accretion disksMHDplanetary systems: protoplanetary disks
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 14 , Symposium S345: Origins: From the Protosun to the First Steps of Life , August 2018 , pp. 102 - 105
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020 

References

Bai, X.-N. 2011, ApJ, 739, 50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, X.-N. 2014, ApJ, 791, 137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, X.-N. 2017, ApJ, 845, 75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, X.-N., & Goodman, J. 2009, ApJ, 701, 737 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, X.-N., & Stone, J. M. 2011, ApJ, 736, 144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, X.-N., & Stone, J. M. 2013, ApJ, 769, 76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béthune, W., Lesur, G., & Ferreira, J. 2017, A&A, 600, A75 Google Scholar
Balbus, S. A., & Hawley, J. F. 1991, ApJ, 376, 214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blandford, R. D., & Payne, D. G. 1982, MNRAS, 199, 883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, T., & Stone, J. M. 2003, ApJ, 585, 908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammie, C. F. 1996, ApJ, 457, 355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, O., Turner, N. J., Nelson, R. P., & McNally, C. P. 2015, ApJ, 801, 84 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartigan, P., Edwards, S., & Ghandour, L. 1995, ApJ, 452, 736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., Gullbring, E., & D’Alessio, P. 1998, ApJ, 495, 385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilgner, M., & Nelson, R. P. 2006, A&A, 445, 205 Google Scholar
Kunz, M. W. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 1494 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesur, G., Kunz, M. W., & Fromang, S. 2014, A&A, 566, A56 Google Scholar
Perez-Becker, D., & Chiang, E. 2011, ApJ, 735, 8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, M. N., Pascucci, I., Edwards, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, M. 2007, AP&SS, 311, 35 Google Scholar