Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:27:44.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tidal disruption of stripped red giants by massive black holes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

Y. Lu ,
Y. F. Huang ,
S. N. Zhang  and
P. Lu
Y. Lu
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China email: [email protected]
Y. F. Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
S. N. Zhang
Affiliation:
Physics Department and Center for Astrophysics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
P. Lu
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We investigate the tidal disruption of a red giant whose envelope is thought to be stripped off when it passed by a massive black hole. Since the low-density stellar envelope would be lost, the tidal disruption of a red giant by massive black hole is regarded as primarily happening in its core region. The object is called a stripped red giant (SRG). Comparing our results with the three candidate tidal disruption events detected by Chandra in 2001 and 2002, i.e., the X-ray flares of NGC 5905, RX J1242.6-1119A, and RX J1624.9+7554, we argue that the tidal disruption of a stripped red giant is strongly ruled out.

Keywords

Accretion: accretion disksblack hole physicsgalaxies: nuclei
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 4 , Symposium S252: The Art of Modeling Stars in the 21st Century , April 2008 , pp. 343 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Alexander, T. 2005, Physics Reports 419, 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrarese, L. & Merritt, D. 2000, ApJ 539, L9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, J. & Rees, M. 1976, MNRAS 176, 633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gezari, S., Halpern, J. P., Komossa, S., Grupe, D., & Leighly, K. M. 2003, ApJ 592, 42 (erratum 601, 1159, [2004])CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grupe, D., Thomas, H. C., & Leighly, K. M. 1999, A&A 350, L31Google Scholar
Halpern, J. P., Gezari, S., & Komossa, S. 2004, ApJ 604, 572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Z., Tout, C. A., & Eggleton, P. P. 2000, MNRAS 319, 215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidskii, V. V. & Ozernoi, L.M. 1979, Sov. Astron. Lett. 5, 16Google Scholar
Loeb, A. & Ulmer, A. 1997, ApJ 489, 573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Y., Cheng, K. S., & Zhang, S. N. 2003, ApJ 590, 52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Y., Cheng, K. S., & Huang, Y.F. 2006, ApJ 641, 288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luminet, J. P. & Barbuy, B. 1990, AJ 61, 219Google Scholar
Rees, M. J. 1988, Nature 333, 523CrossRefGoogle Scholar