Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:35:52.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Stellar Perspective on the Magnetic Future of the Sun

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2018

Travis S. Metcalfe*
Affiliation:
Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut Street, Suite 205, Boulder CO 80301USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

After decades of effort, the solar magnetic cycle is exceptionally well characterized, but it remains poorly understood. Pioneering work at the Mount Wilson Observatory demonstrated that other Sun-like stars also show regular activity cycles, and identified two distinct relationships between the rotation rate and the length of the cycle. The solar cycle appears to be an outlier, falling between the two stellar relationships, potentially threatening the very foundation of the solar-stellar connection. Recent discoveries emerging from NASA’s Kepler space telescope have started to shed light on this perplexing result, suggesting that the Sun’s rotation rate and magnetic field are currently in a transitional phase that occurs in all middle-aged stars. We have recently identified the manifestation of this magnetic transition in the best available data on stellar cycles. These observations suggest that the solar cycle is currently growing longer on stellar evolutionary timescales, and that the global dynamo may shut down entirely sometime in the next 0.8-2.4 Gyr. Future tests of this hypothesis will come from ground-based activity monitoring of Kepler targets that span the magnetic transition, and from asteroseismology with the TESS mission to determine precise masses and ages for bright stars with known cycles.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Böhm-Vitense, E. 2007, ApJ, 657, 486Google Scholar
Metcalfe, T. S., Egeland, R., & van Saders, J. 2016, ApJ (Letters) 826, L2Google Scholar
Metcalfe, T. S. & van Saders, J. 2017, Solar Phys., 292, 126Google Scholar
Skumanich, A. 1972, ApJ, 171, 565Google Scholar
van Saders, J. L., Ceillier, T., Metcalfe, T. S., et al. 2016, Nature, 529, 181Google Scholar