Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:08:49.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SpS1-Preparing for the harvest from large infrared surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2010

Deborah L. Padgett*
Affiliation:
Spitzer Science Center, California Institute of Technology, M/C 220-6, Pasadena, California 91214, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the past decade, there has been a revolution in the availability of multi-wavelength astronomical surveys. From the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) to the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS), astronomical research based on publicly accessible datasets is becoming standard practice in the community. Beginning with the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) mission, infrared surveys have played a critical role in stellar astronomy by identifying cool and dusty stars worthy of spectroscopic characterization. IRAS' four photometric bands at 12, 25, 60, and 100 μm were ideal for detecting dusty circumstellar material. All-sky surveys like IRAS reveal the brightest members of each class of rare objects, optimizing their follow-up strategy. The case of debris disks around main sequence stars demonstrates this utility. IRAS detected dust disks around four nearby stars, Beta Pictoris, Fomalhaut, Epsilon Eridani, and Vega. The “Fabulous Four” remain the best studied debris disks, despite hundreds of additional examples discovered by the Spitzer Space Telescope. In the nearly 30 years since IRAS was launched, its highly reliable catalog of just 250000 sources, modest by modern standards, with arcminute scale resolution and 0.3 - 1 Jy sensitivity, has generated over 10,000 references in ADS. This is a success story by any measure.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Reid, I. N. et al. 2008, AJ 136, 1290Google Scholar
Metchev, S. A., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Berriman, G. B., & Looper, D. 2008, Ap.J. 676, 1281Google Scholar
Burningham, B. et al. 2009, MNRAS 395, 1237Google Scholar