Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:43:54.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Spatial Structure of the Galactic outer disk with LAMOST DR3 K giant stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2018

Haifeng Wang
Affiliation:
Key laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China; email: [email protected] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China(UCAS)
Chao Liu
Affiliation:
Key laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China; email: [email protected]
Licai Deng
Affiliation:
Key laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China; email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The spatial structure of the Milky Way outer disk is characterized with ~ 70000 LAMOST DR3 K giants after carefully correction of their selection effects. By slicing the data into various Galactocentric radius bins, we are able to fit the vertical stellar density profile with a models composed of two isothermal-sheet disks and an oblate power-law halo. We find that although the thin disk is significantly flared, the radial surface density profile can extend to as far as 19 kpc. Beyond 12 kpc, only one thicker disk, rather than two disk components, are found in the samples. Moreover, the residual of the density profiles after subtracting the best fit models show different oscillation patterns in almost all range of detecting radius.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Alard, C. 2000, preprint[astro-ph/0007013]Google Scholar
Carlin, J. L., Liu, C., Newberg, H., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 4Google Scholar
Deng, L. C., Newberg, H., et al. 2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 735Google Scholar
Liu, C., et al. 2017, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 17, 96Google Scholar
López-Corredoira, M., Cabrera-Savers, A., Carzón, F., et al., 2002, A&A, 394, 883Google Scholar
Roškar, R., Debattista, V. P., Stinson, G. S., Quinn, T. R., & Wadsley, J., 2008, APJ, 675: L65L68Google Scholar
Rix, H.- W. & Bovy, J., 2013, A&ARv, 21, 61Google Scholar
Widrow, L. M., Gardner, S., Yanny, B., Dodelson, S., & Chen, H.-Y., 2012, ApJL, 750, L41Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Newberg, H. J., Carlin, J. L., et al. 2015, APJ, 801, 105Google Scholar