Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:22:30.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The solar wind in time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2012

Jeffrey L. Linsky ,
Brian E. Wood  and
Seth Redfield
Jeffrey L. Linsky
Affiliation:
JILA, University of Colorado and NIST, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0440, USA email: [email protected]
Brian E. Wood
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Space Science Division, Washington, DC 20375, USA email: [email protected]
Seth Redfield
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We describe our method for measuring mass loss rates of F–M main sequence stars with high-resolution Lyman-α line profiles. Our diagnostic is the extra absorption on the blue side the interstellar hydrogen absorption produced by neutral hydrogen gas in the hydrogen walls of stars. For stars with low X-ray fluxes, the correlation of observed mass loss rate with X-ray surface flux and age predicts the solar wind mass flux between 700 Myr and the present.

Keywords

ISM:lines and bandsISM:magnetic fieldssolar windstars:windsSun: UV radiationultraviolet:ISM
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 7 , Symposium S286: Comparative Magnetic Minima: Characterizing quiet times in the Sun and Stars , October 2011 , pp. 286 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Ayres, T. R. 1997, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 1641Google Scholar
Baranov, V. B. & Malama, Y. G. 1995, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 14755Google Scholar
Cranmer, S. R. & Saar, S. H. 2011, ApJ, 741, 54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donati, J.-F. & Landstreet, J. D. 2009, ARAA, 47, 333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izmodenov, V. V., Lallement, R., & Malama, Y. G. 1999, A&A, 342, L13Google Scholar
Müller, H.-R., Zank, G. P., & Wood, B. E. 2001, ApJ, 551, 495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, J. L. 1995, Science, 268, 1030Google Scholar
Wood, B. E., Linsky, J. L., Müller, H.-R., & Zank, G. P. 2001, ApJ Letters, 547, L49Google Scholar
Wood, B. E., Müller, H.-R., Zank, G. P., & Linsky, J. L. 2005, ApJ, 574, 412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, B. E., Müller, H.-R., Zank, G. P., Linsky, J. L., & Redfield, S. 2005, ApJ Letters, 628, L143Google Scholar
Zank, G. P., Pauls, H. L., Williams, L. L., & Hall, D. T. 1996, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 21,639CrossRefGoogle Scholar