Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:46:04.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Solar cycles: the past evolution influence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

Alexis Klutsch
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Departamento de Astrofísica, Facultad C.C. Físicas, 28040 Madrid, Spain, email: [email protected] Observatoire Astronomique, Université de Strasbourg & CNRS, UMR 7550, 11 rue de l'Université, 67000 Strasbourg, France, email: [email protected]
Rubens Freire Ferrero
Affiliation:
Observatoire Astronomique, Université de Strasbourg & CNRS, UMR 7550, 11 rue de l'Université, 67000 Strasbourg, France, email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The so-called solar cycle is generally characterized by the quasi-periodic oscillatory evolution of the photospheric spots number. This quasi-periodic pattern has always been an intriguing question. Several physical models were proposed to explain this evolution and many mathematical data analysis were employed to determine the principal frequencies noticeable in the measured data. Both approaches try to predict the future evolution of the solar activity and to understand the physical phenomena producing these cycles. Here we present the analysis of the sunspots number evolution using the time-delay approach. Our results show than the solar cycle can also be characterized by this behavior implying the influence of the past evolution over the present one, suggesting an histeresis mechanism, linked probably with magnetic activity.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Archibald, D. 2006, Energy & Environment, 17, 29Google Scholar
Benevolenskaya, E. E. 1998, ApJ, 509, L49Google Scholar
Brajša, R., Wöhl, H., Hanslmeier, A., et al. 2009, A&A, 496, 855Google Scholar
Clilverd, M. A., Clarke, E., Rishbeth, H., et al. 2003, Astronomy and Geophysics, 44, 5.20Google Scholar
Hathaway, D. H. & Wilson, R. M. 2006, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L18101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. D. 1993, Mathematical Biology, 2nd corr. ed. (Springer)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sello, S. 2003, A&A, 410, 691Google Scholar