Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T04:23:33.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simultaneous formation of Jupiter and Saturn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2011

Octavio M. Guilera ,
Adrián Brunini  and
Omar G. Benvenuto
Octavio M. Guilera
Affiliation:
Facultad de Cs. Astronómicas y Geofísicas - Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata (IALP) - CONICET email: [email protected]
Adrián Brunini
Affiliation:
Facultad de Cs. Astronómicas y Geofísicas - Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata (IALP) - CONICET email: [email protected]
Omar G. Benvenuto
Affiliation:
Facultad de Cs. Astronómicas y Geofísicas - Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata (IALP) - CONICET email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We calculate the simultaneous in situ formation of Jupiter and Saturn by the core instability mechanism considering the oligarchic growth regime for the accretion of planetesimals. We consider a density distribution for the size of planetesimals and planetesimals migration. The planets are immersed in a realistic protoplanetary disk that evolves with time. We find that, within the classical model of solar nebula, the isolated formation of Jupiter and Saturn undergoes significant change when it occurs simultaneously.

Keywords

planets and satellites: formationplanets and satellites: individual (Jupiter, Saturn)
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 6 , Symposium S276: The Astrophysics of Planetary Systems: Formation, Structure, and Dynamical Evolution , October 2010 , pp. 428 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Alibert, Y., Mordasini, C., Benz, W., & Winisdoerffer, C. 2005, A&A, 434, 343Google Scholar
Bodenheimer, P. & Pollack, J. B. 1986, Icarus, 67, 391Google Scholar
Dodson-Robinson, S. E., Bodenheimer, P., Laughlin, G., Willacy, K., Turner, N. J., & Beichman, C. A. 2008, ApJ (Letters), 688, L99Google Scholar
Fortier, A., Benvenuto, O. G., & Brunini, A. 2007, A&A, 473, 311Google Scholar
Fortier, A., Benvenuto, O. G., & Brunini, A. 2009, A&A, 500, 1249Google Scholar
Guilera, O. M., Brunini, A., & Benvenuto, O. G. 2010, A&A, 521, A50Google Scholar
Hayashi, C. 1981, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 70, 35Google Scholar
Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2005, Icarus, 179, 415Google Scholar
Mizuno, H. 1980, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 64, 544Google Scholar
Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., & Bodenheimer, P. et al. 1996, Icarus, 124, 62Google Scholar