Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:53:09.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shaping the initial-final mass relation of white dwarfs with AGB outflows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2022

Paola Marigo*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy G. Galilei, University of Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 3,i IT-35136, Padova, Italy email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A recent analysis of a few carbon-oxygen white dwarfs in old open clusters of the Milky Way (MW) identified a kink in the initial-final mass relation (IFMR), located over a range of initial masses, 1.65 ≲ Mi/M ≲ 2.10, which unexpectedly interrupts the commonly assumed monotonic trend. The proposed interpretation links this observational fact to the formation of carbon stars and the modest outflows (with mass loss rate < 10−7 M/yr) that are expected as long as the carbon excess remains too low to produce dust grains in sufficient amount. Under these conditions the mass of the carbon-oxygen core can grow more than is generally predicted by stellar models. We discuss these new findings also in light of a new systematic follow-up investigation, based on Gaia EDR3, of evolved giants (13 carbon stars, 3 S stars and 4 M stars) belonging to intermediate-age open clusters.

Type
Contributed Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Bladh, S., Eriksson, K., Marigo, P., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A119 Google Scholar
Bloecker, T. 1995, A&A, 297, 727 Google Scholar
Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantat-Gaudin, T., Anders, F., Castro-Ginard, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 640, A1 Google Scholar
Cummings, J. D., Kalirai, J. S., Tremblay, P.-E., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, K., Nowotny, W., Höfner, S., et al. 2014, A&A, 566, A95 Google Scholar
Ferrarotti, A. S. & Gail, H.-P. 2006, A&A, 447, 553 Google Scholar
Groenewegen, M. A. T. 2021, A&A, 654, A20 Google Scholar
Herwig, F. 2005, ARAA, 43, 435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, D. L., Gustafsson, B., Eriksson, K., et al. 1986, ApJS, 62, 373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, I. & Trabucchi, M. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 4678 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marigo, P., Bossini, D., Trabucchi, M., et al. 2022, ApJS, 258, 43 Google Scholar
Marigo, P., Cummings, J. D., Curtis, J. L., et al. 2020, Nature Astron., 4, 1102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marigo, P., Bressan, A., Nanni, A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 488 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marigo, P. & Aringer, B. 2009, A&A, 508, 1539 Google Scholar
Mattsson, L., Wahlin, R., & Höfner, S. 2010, A&A, 509, A14 Google Scholar
Schöier, F. L. & Olofsson, H. 2001, A&A, 368, 969 Google Scholar
Vassiliadis, E. & Wood, P. R. 1993, ApJ, 413, 641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar