Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:40:13.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Searching for the secondary eclipse of CoRoT-Exo-2b and its transit timing variations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2008

Roi Alonso
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille (UMR 6110), Technopole de Marseille-Etoile, F-13388 Marseille cedex 13 (France) email: [email protected]
Suzanne Aigrain
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX44QL, United Kingdom
Frédéric Pont
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX44QL, United Kingdom
Tsevi Mazeh
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astonomy, R. and B. Sackler Faculty of Exact SciencesTel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

With more than 80 transits observed in the CoRoT lightcurve with a cadence of 32 s, CoRoT-Exo-2b provides an excellent case to search for the secondary eclipse of the planet, with an expected signal of less than 10−4 in relative flux. The activity of the star causes a modulation on the flux that makes the detection of this signal challenging. We describe the technique used to seek for the secondary eclipse, that leads to a tentative 2.5σ detection of a 5.5×10−5 eclipse. If the effect of the spots are not taken into account, the times of transit centers will also be affected. They could lead to an erroneous detection of periodic transit timing variations of ~20 s and with a 7.45 d period. By measuring the transit central times at different depths of the transit (transit bisectors), we show that there are no such periodic variations in the CoRoT-Exo-2b O-C residuals larger than ~10 s.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2009

References

Agol, E., Steffen, J., Re'em, S., & Clarkson, W. 2005 MNRAS, 359, 567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, R., Auvergne, M., Baglin, A., Ollivier, M. et al. 2008, A&A, 482, L21Google Scholar
Baglin, A., et al. , this volumeGoogle Scholar
Barge, P., Baglin, A., Auvergne, M., Rauer, H. et al. 2008, A&A, 482, L19Google Scholar
Barge, P., et al. , this volumeGoogle Scholar
Charbonneau, D., Noyes, R. W., Korzennik, S. G., Nisenson, P., Jha, S., Vogt, S. S., & Kibrick, R. I. 1999 ApJ, 522, L145Google Scholar
Collier Cameron, A., Horne, K., Penny, A., & James, D. 1999, Nature, 6763, 751Google Scholar
Fortney, J., Lodders, K., Marley, M. S., & Freedman, R. S. 2008 ApJ, 678, 1419Google Scholar
Holman, M. & Murray, 2005 Science 307, 1288Google Scholar
Knutson, H. A., Charbonneau, D., Allen, L. E., Burrows, A., & Megeath, S. T. 2008 ApJ, 673, 526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Morales, M. & Seager, S. 2007 ApJ, 667, L191Google Scholar
Miller-Ricci, E., et al. , this volumeGoogle Scholar
Rowe, J. F., Matthews, J. M., Seager, S., Miller-Ricci, E. et al. ApJ submitted, astro-ph/0711.4111Google Scholar