Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:34:01.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A search for new γ-ray blazars from infrared selected candidates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2021

Blessing Musiimenta ,
Bruno Sversut Arsioli ,
Edward Jurua  and
Tom Mutabazi
Blessing Musiimenta
Affiliation:
Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST), Mbarara, Uganda email: [email protected]
Bruno Sversut Arsioli
Affiliation:
Instituto de Fisica Gleb Wataghin IFGW, Unicamp, Brasil
Edward Jurua
Affiliation:
Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST), Mbarara, Uganda email: [email protected]
Tom Mutabazi
Affiliation:
Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST), Mbarara, Uganda email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a systematic study of gamma-ray blazar candidates based on a sample of 40 objects taken from the WIBR catalogue. By using a likelihood analysis, 26 of the 40 sources showed significant gamma-ray signatures ⩾ 3σ. Using high-energy test statistics (TS) maps, we confirm 8 sources, which are completely new, and show another 15 promising γ-ray candidates. The results from this analysis show that a multi-frequency approach can help to improve the current description of the gamma-ray sky.

Keywords

Galaxies: activegamma-rays: blazars
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 15 , Symposium S356: Nuclear Activity in Galaxies Across Cosmic Time , October 2019 , pp. 329 - 331
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Abdo, A. A., et al., 2010, ApJS, 188, 405 10.1088/0067-0049/188/2/405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdo, A. A., et al., 2010, ApJ, 720, 435 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdollahi, S., et al., 2020, ApJS, 247, 33 10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bcbCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acero, F., et al., 2015, ApJS, 218, 23 10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajello, M., et al., 2015, ApJ, 800, 27 10.1088/2041-8205/800/2/L27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arsioli, B. & Chang, Y.-L., 2017, A&A, 598, 134 Google Scholar
Arsioli, B. & Polenta, G., 2018, A&A, 616, 20 Google Scholar
Chang, Y.-L., Arsioli, B., Giommi, P. & Padovani, P., 2017, A&A, 598, 17 Google ScholarPubMed
D’Abrusco, R., et al., 2014, ApJS, 215, 14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massaro, E., et al., 2015, Ap&SS, 357, 75 Google Scholar
Mattox, J. R., et al., 1996, ApJ, 461, 396 10.1086/177068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, R., et al., 1997, ApJ, 490, 116 10.1086/304851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urry, C. M., & Padovani, P., 1995, PASP, 107, 803 10.1086/133630CrossRefGoogle Scholar