Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:17:07.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Scaling of Star Formation: from Molecular Clouds to Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2015

Daniela Calzetti
Daniela Calzetti*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, 710 North Pleasant Street, Amhest, MA 01003, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This is a review of the extant literature and recent work on the scaling relation(s) that link the gas content of galaxies to the measured star formation rates. A diverse array of observing techniques and underlying physical assumptions characterize the determination of these relations at different scales, that range from the tens of parsec sizes of molecular clouds to the tens of kpc sizes of whole galaxies. Different techniques and measurements, and a variety of strategies, have been used by many authors to compare the scaling relations, both within and across galaxies. Although the picture is far from final, the past decade has seen tremendous progress in this field, and more progress is expected over the next several years.

Keywords

galaxies: star formation – galaxies: ISM – ISM:clouds
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 10 , Issue S309: Galaxies in 3D across the Universe , July 2014 , pp. 121 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Barden, M., Rix, H. W., Somerville, R. S., et al. 2005, ApJ, 635, 959Google Scholar
Blanc, G., Heiderman, A., Gebhardt, K., et al. 2009, ApJ, 704, 842Google Scholar
Bigiel, F., Leroy, A., Fabian, F., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2846Google Scholar
Boissier, S., Prantzos, N., Boselli, A., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1215Google Scholar
Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M. & Leroy, A. K. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 207Google Scholar
Calzetti, D., Liu, G. & Koda, J. 2012, ApJ, 752, 98Google Scholar
Cormier, D., Madden, S. C., Lebouteiller, V., et al. 2014, A&A, 564A, 121Google Scholar
Crocker, A. F., Chandar, R., Calzetti, D., et al. 2014, submittedGoogle Scholar
Daddi, E., Elbaz, D., Walter, F., et al. 2010a, ApJ, 714, L118Google Scholar
Daddi, E., Bournaud, F., Walter, F., et al. 2010b, ApJ, 713, 686Google Scholar
Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Quataert, E. & Hopkins, P. F. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 1970Google Scholar
Galametz, M., Albrecht, M., Kennicutt, R., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2542Google Scholar
Genzel, R., Tacconi, L. J., Gracia-Carpio, J., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 2091Google Scholar
Genzel, R., Tacconi, L. J., Lutz, D., et al. 2014, (astroph/1409.1171)Google Scholar
Gutermuth, R. A., Pipher, J. L., Megeath, S. T., et al. 2011, ApJ, 739, 84Google Scholar
Heiderman, A., Evans, N. J., Allen, L. E., et al. 2010, ApJ, 723, 1019Google Scholar
Heyer, M. H., Corbelli, E., Schneider, S. E. & Young, J. S. 2004, ApJ, 602, 723Google Scholar
Johnson, B. D., Weisz, D. R., Dalcanton, J. J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772, 8Google Scholar
Kawamura, A., Mizuno, Y., Minamidani, T., et al. 2009, ApJS, 184, 1Google Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. Jr., 1989, ApJ, 344, 685Google Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. Jr., 1998, ApJ, 498, 541Google Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C., Calzetti, D., Walter, F., et al. 2007, ApJ, 671, 333Google Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C., Evans, N. J. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 531Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A., Calzetti, D., Kennicutt, R., et al. 2014, ApJ, 789, 130Google Scholar
Koda, J., Scoville, N., Hasegawa, T., et al. 2012, ApJ, 761, 41Google Scholar
Krumholz, M. R., McKee, C. F. & Tumlinson, J. 2009, ApJ, 693, 216Google Scholar
Krumholz, M. R., Dekel, A. & McKee, C. F. 2012, ApJ, 745, 69Google Scholar
Lada, C. J., Forbrich, J., Lombardi, M. & Alves, J. F. 2012, ApJ, 745, 19Google Scholar
Lada, C. J., Forbrich, J., Roman–Zuniga, C., et al. 2013, ApJ, 778, 133Google Scholar
Langer, W. D., Velusamy, T., Pineda, J. L., et al. 2014, A&A, 561A, 122Google Scholar
Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., Bigiel, F., et al. 2009, AJ, 137, 4670Google Scholar
Leroy, A. K., Bigiel, F., de Blok, W. J. G.., et al. 2012, AJ, 144, 3Google Scholar
Liu, G., Koda, J., Calzetti, D., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 63Google Scholar
Momose, R., Koda, J., Kennicutt, R. C., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772, L13Google Scholar
Narayanan, D., Krumholz, M., Ostriker, E. C., & Hernquist, L. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 664Google Scholar
Rémy-Ruyer, A., Madden, S. C., Galliano, F., et al. 2014, A&A, 536A, 31Google Scholar
Rigopoulou, D., Hurley, P. D., Swinyard, B. M., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 2051Google Scholar
Sandstrom, K. M., Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 5Google Scholar
Santini, D., Maiolino, R., Magnelli, B., et al. 2014, A&A, 562A, 30Google Scholar
Saintonge, A., Kauffmann, G., Wang, J., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 61Google Scholar
Shetty, R., Kelly, B. C., Rahman, N., et al. 2014a, MNRAS, 437, L61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shetty, R., Clark, P. C. & Klessen, R. S. 2014b, MNRAS, 442, 2208Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., 1959, ApJ, 129, 243Google Scholar
Tacconi, L. J., Neri, R., Genzel, R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 768, 74Google Scholar
Thilker, D. A., Walterbos, R. A. M., Braun, R., & Hoopes, C. G. 2002, AJ, 124, 3118Google Scholar
Verley, S., Corbelli, E., Giovanardi, C., & Hunt, L. 2010, A&A, 510A, 64Google Scholar
Wolfire, M. G., Hollenbach, D. & McKee, C. F. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1191Google Scholar