Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:35:26.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scale Free Processes in Galaxy Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2016

Nir Mandelker
Affiliation:
Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel email: [email protected]
Avishai Dekel
Affiliation:
Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

According to the ΛCDM paradigm of cosmology, galaxies form at the centers of dark matter (DM) halos. While galaxy formation involves complex baryonic physics, the formation of DM halos is governed solely by gravity and cosmology. As a result, many of their properties exhibit a near scale-free behaviour, self-similar in either halo mass, cosmic time or both. This is especially true in the Einstein-de Sitter (EdS) regime, valid at redshifts z ≳ 1, when cosmological scaling relations become particularly simple, and in the narrow mass range of normal galaxies, where the fluctuation power spectrum can be approximated by a power law. Since many galaxy properties are strongly correlated with halo mass, they tend to exhibit a self-similar behaviour as well. A partial list of self-similar properties include the mass function of DM halos, the structure of the cosmic web, the accretion/merger rate of matter onto halos, the density profiles of DM halos and their angular momentum, which eventually determines the galaxy structure. We briefly review these below, and comment on how they can be used in conjunction with simple toy models to gain insight into galaxy formation.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Bond, J. R., Cole, S., Efstathiou, G., & Kaiser, N. 1991, ApJ 379 440460 Google Scholar
Bond, J. R., Kofman, L., & Pogosyan, D. 1996, Nature 380 603606 Google Scholar
Bullock, J. S., Dekel, A., Kolatt, T. S., et al. 2001, ApJ 555 240257 Google Scholar
Danovich, M., Dekel, A., Hahn, O., et al. 2015, MNRAS 449 20872111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekel, A. & Birnboim, Y. 2006, MNRAS 368 220 Google Scholar
Dekel, A., Zolotov, A., Tweed, D., et al. 2013, MNRAS 435 9991019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekel, A. & Mandelker, N. 2014, MNRAS 444 20712084 Google Scholar
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 1996, ApJ 462 563575 Google Scholar
Neistein, E. & Dekel, A. 2008, MNRAS 383 615626 Google Scholar
Peebles, P. J. E. 1969 ApJ 155 393401 Google Scholar
Porciani, C., Dekel, A., & Hoffman, Y. 2002, MNRAS 332 325338 Google Scholar
Press, W. H. & Schechter, P. 1974, ApJ 187 425438 Google Scholar
Schechter, P. 1976 ApJ 203 297306 Google Scholar
Song, M., Finkelstein, S. L., Ashby, M. L. N., et al. 2015 ArXiv e-prints, 1507.05636Google Scholar
White, S. D. M. 1984 ApJ 286 3841 Google Scholar
Zel'dovich, Y. B. 1970 AAp 5 8489 Google Scholar