Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:28:36.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of failed accretion disk winds in active galactic nuclei

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2021

Margherita Giustini  and
Daniel Proga
Margherita Giustini
Affiliation:
Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), Departamento de Astrofísica, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, Villanueva de la Cañada, E-28692 Madrid, Spain email: [email protected]
Daniel Proga
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 South Maryland Parkway, NV 89154-4002 Las Vegas, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Both observational and theoretical evidence point at outflows originating from accretion disks as fundamental ingredients of active galactic nuclei (AGN). These outflows can have more than one component, for example an unbound supersonic wind and a failed wind (FW). The latter is a prediction of the simulations of radiation-driven disk outflows which show that the former is accompanied by an inner failed component, where the flow struggles to escape from the strong gravitational pull of the supermassive black hole. This FW component could provide a physical framework to interpret various phenomenological components of AGN. Here we briefly discuss a few of them: the broad line region, the X-ray obscurer, and the X-ray corona.

Keywords

accretionaccretion disksblack hole physicsgalaxies: active
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 15 , Symposium S356: Nuclear Activity in Galaxies Across Cosmic Time , October 2019 , pp. 82 - 86
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Allen, J. T., Hewett, P. C., Maddox, N., Richards, G. T., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 4105, 86010.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17489.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castor, J. I., Abbott, D. C., & Klein, R. I. 1975, ApJ, 195, 15710.1086/153315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czerny, B. & Hryniewicz, K. 2011, A&A, 525, 8Google Scholar
Dannen, R. C., Proga, D., Kallman, T. R., & Waters, T. 2019, ApJ, 882, 9910.3847/1538-4357/ab340bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Done, C., Davis, S. W., Jin, C., Blaes, O., & Ward, M. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 184810.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19779.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrero, J., Kriss, G. A., Kaastra, J. S., & Ely, J. C. 2016, Ap&A, 586, 72Google Scholar
Gaskell, C. M. 1982, ApJ, 263, 7910.1086/160481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giustini, M. & Proga, D. 2019, A&A, 630, 94Google Scholar
Haardt, F. & Maraschi, L. 1993, ApJ, 413, 50710.1086/173020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaastra, J. S., Kriss, G. A., Cappi, M., Mehdipour, M., et al. 2014, Science, 345, 6410.1126/science.1253787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriss, G. A., Mehdipour, M., Kaastra, J. S., Rau, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 621, 12Google Scholar
Marziani, P., Sulentic, J. W., Dultzin-Hacyan, D., Calvani, M., et al. 1996, ApJ, 104, 37Google Scholar
Mehdipour, M., Kaastra, J. S., Kriss, G. A., Cappi, M., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, 22Google Scholar
Mehdipour, M., Kaastra, J. S., Kriss, G. A., Arav, N., et al. 2017, A&A, 607, 28Google Scholar
Murray, N., Chiang, J., Grossman, S. A., & Voit, G. M. 1995, ApJ, 451, 49810.1086/176238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, B. M., Ferrarese, L., Gilbert, K. M., Kaspi, S., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 68210.1086/423269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrucci, P.-O., Ursini, F., De Rosa, A., Bianchi, S., et al. 2018, A&A, 611, 59Google Scholar
Proga, D., Stone, J. M., & Kallman, T. R. 2000, ApJ, 543, 68610.1086/317154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proga, D. & Kallman, T. R. 2004, ApJ, 616, 68810.1086/425117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proga, D. 2005, ApJ, 630, 910.1086/462417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankine, A. L., Hewett, P. C., Banerji, M., & Richards, G. T. 2020, MNRAS in press, arXiv:1912.08700Google Scholar
Richards, G. T., Kruczek, N. E., Gallagher, S. C., Hall, P. B., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 16710.1088/0004-6256/141/5/167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risaliti, G. & Elvis, M. 2010, A&A, 516, 89Google Scholar
Sulentic, J. W., Zwitter, T., Marziani, P., & Dultzin-Hacyan, D. 2000, ApJ, 536, 510.1086/312717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulentic, J. W. & Marziani, P. 2015, FrASS, 2, 6Google Scholar
Waters, T., Kashi, A., Proga, D., Eracleous, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 827, 5310.3847/0004-637X/827/1/53CrossRefGoogle Scholar