Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:00:05.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of cluster age on the onset of multiple populations in stellar clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

S. Martocchia Open the ORCID record for S. Martocchia [Opens in a new window]
S. Martocchia*
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 2, D-85748 Garching bei München, Germany Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University,146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The origin of the chemical anomalies in star clusters is still an open question, although much effort has been employed both from a theoretical and observational point of view. The exploration of the dependence of such multiple stellar populations based on certain cluster properties (e.g. mass, age, metallicity) has represented a compelling line of investigation so far. Here I report an overview of the results obtained from our latest surveys aimed at characterising the phenomenon of chemical variations in star clusters that are much younger with respect to the ancient globular clusters. The fundamental question we are asking is whether these abundance patterns are only restricted to the old massive clusters; and if not, is there a difference between young and old objects?

Keywords

star clustersstarsmultiple populationschemistryphotometryspectroscopy
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 14 , Symposium S351: Star Clusters: From the Milky Way to the Early Universe , May 2019 , pp. 329 - 332
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Bastian, N. & Lardo, C. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bragaglia, A., Gratton, R. G., Carretta, E., D’Orazi, V., Sneden, C., & Lucatello, S. 2012, ARA&A, 548, A122Google Scholar
Cannon, R. D., Croke, B. F. W., Bell, R. A., Hesser, J. E., & Stathakis, R. A. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardini, D. & Cassatella, A. 2007, ApJ, 666, 393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carretta, E.et al. 2009, A&A, 505, 117Google Scholar
Chantereau, W., Salaris, M., Bastian, N., Martocchia, S. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 5236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollyhead, K.et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, L39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollyhead, K.et al. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollyhead, K.et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 4718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, M. G. H., Charbonnel, C., Bastian, N., & Diehl, R. 2016, A&A, 587, A53Google Scholar
Lagioia, E. P., Milone, A. P., Marino, A. F., & Dotter, A. 2019, ApJ, 871, 140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martocchia, S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 3150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martocchia, S.et al. 2018a, MNRAS, 473, 2688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martocchia, S.et al. 2018b, MNRAS, 477, 4696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martocchia, S.et al. 2019, MNRAS in press, arXiv:1906.03273Google Scholar
Niederhofer, F.et al. 2017a, MNRAS, 464, 94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niederhofer, F.et al. 2017b, MNRAS, 465, 4159CrossRefGoogle Scholar