Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:48:42.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ROCHE: Analysis of Eclipsing Binary Multi-Dataset Observables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2012

Theodor Pribulla*
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 059 60 Tatranská Lomnica, Slovakia email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Code ROCHE is devoted to modeling multi-dataset observations of close eclipsing binaries such as radial velocities, multi-wavelength light curves, and broadening functions. The code includes circular surface spots, eccentric orbits, asynchronous or/and differential rotation, and third light. The program makes use of synthetic spectra to compute observed UBVRIJHK magnitudes from the surface model and the parallax. The surface grid is derived from a regular icosahedron to secure more-or-less equal (triangular) surface elements with observed intensities computed from synthetic spectra for supplied passband transmission curves. The limb-darkening is automatically interpolated from the tables after each computing step. All proximity effects (tidal deformation, reflection effect, gravity darkening) are taken into account. Integration of synthetic curves is improved by adaptive phase step (important for wide eclipsing systems).

The code is still under development. It is planned to extend its capabilities towards low mass ratios and widely different radii of components to facilitate modeling of extrasolar planet transits. Another planned extension of the code will be modeling of spatially-resolved eclipsing binaries using relative visual orbits and/or interferometric visibilities.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Binnendijk, L. 1977, Vistas in Astronomy, 21, 359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budaj, J. & Richards, M. T. 2004, Contrib. Astron. Observatory Skalnaté Pleso, 34, 167Google Scholar
Djuraševic, G. 1992, Ap&SS, 196, 241Google Scholar
Drechsel, H., Haas, S., Lorenz, R., & Gayler, S. 1995, A&A, 294, 723Google Scholar
Hilditch, R. W. 2001, An introduction to close binary stars, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lejeune, T., Cuisinier, F., & Buser, R. 1997, A&AS, 125, 229Google Scholar
Lucy, L. B. 1968a, ApJ, 151, 1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, L. B. 1968b, ApJ, 153, 877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mochnacki, S. W. & Doughty, N. A. 1972, MNRAS, 156, 51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pribulla, T., Merand, A., Kervella, P. et al. , 2011, A&A, 528, 21Google Scholar
Pribulla, T., Rucinski, S. M., Latham, D. W. et al. , 2010, AN, 331, 397Google Scholar
Prša, A., Guinan, E. F., Devinney, E. J. et al. , 2008, ApJ, 687, 542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prša, A. & Zwitter, T. 2005, ApJ, 628, 426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rucinski, S. M. 1992, AJ, 104, 1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hamme, W. 1993, AJ, 106, 2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.E. 234, 1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. E. 1994, PASP, 106, 921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. E. & Devinney, E. J. 1971, AJP, 166, 605Google Scholar