Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:32:48.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reference frames and the physical gravito-electromagnetic analogy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

L. Filipe O. Costa  and
Carlos A. R. Herdeiro
L. Filipe O. Costa
Affiliation:
Centro de Física do Porto e Departamento de Física da Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal email: [email protected] email: [email protected]
Carlos A. R. Herdeiro
Affiliation:
Centro de Física do Porto e Departamento de Física da Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The similarities between linearized gravity and electromagnetism are known since the early days of General Relativity. Using an exact approach based on tidal tensors, we show that such analogy holds only on very special conditions and depends crucially on the reference frame. This places restrictions on the validity of the “gravito-electromagnetic” equations commonly found in literature.

Keywords

GravitomagnetismFrame DraggingPapapetrou equation
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S261: Relativity in Fundamental Astronomy: Dynamics, Reference Frames, and Data Analysis , April 2009 , pp. 31 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Maartens, R. & Basset, B. 1998, Class. Q. Grav., 15, 705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damour, T., Soffel, M., & Xu, C. 1991, Phys. Rev. D., 43, 3273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggiero, M. & Tartaglia, A. 2002, Nuovo Cim., 117B 743 [arXiv:gr-qc/0207065].Google Scholar
Costa, L.Filipe, O., & Herdeiro, Carlos A. R. 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 78, 024021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, L.Filipe, O., & Herdeiro, Carlos A. R. 2007 [arXiv:gr-qc/0612140]Google Scholar
Costa, L.Filipe, O., & Herdeiro, Carlos A. R. 2009, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 24, 1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciufolini, I. & Pavlis, E. 2004, Nature 431, 958; Ciufolini I., Pavlis E., Peron R., New Astron. 11, 527–550 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciufolini, I. & Wheeler, J. 1995, Gravitation and Inertia (Princeton Univ. Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soffel, M., Klioner, S., Muller, J., & Biskupek, L. 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 78, 024033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jantzen, R., Carini, P., & Bini, D. 1992, Ann. Phys., 215, 1 [arXiv:gr-qc/0106043].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natário, J. 2007, Gen. Rel. Grav., 39, 1477 [arXiv:gr-qc/0701067].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordtvedt, K. 1973, Phys. Rev. D, 7, 2347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Will, C. & Nordtvedt, K. 1972, APJ, 177, 757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordtvedt, K. 1988, Int. J. Theoretical Physics, 27, 2347CrossRefGoogle Scholar