Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:29:18.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re-calibration of GSC2.3 with UCAC2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

Z. H. Tang
Affiliation:
Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China email: [email protected]
Z. X. Qi
Affiliation:
Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China email: [email protected] Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
Y. Yu
Affiliation:
Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China email: [email protected]
R. L. Smart
Affiliation:
INAF-Astronomical Observatory of Turin, Pino-Torinese 2010025, Italy
B. Bucciarelli
Affiliation:
INAF-Astronomical Observatory of Turin, Pino-Torinese 2010025, Italy
M. G. Lattanzi
Affiliation:
INAF-Astronomical Observatory of Turin, Pino-Torinese 2010025, Italy
A. Spagna
Affiliation:
INAF-Astronomical Observatory of Turin, Pino-Torinese 2010025, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To make GSC-II more accurate and useful, it is necessary to re-calibrate GSC-II when a better reference catalogue (UCAC2) is available. With UCAC2 as the reference, preliminary re-calibration of some sample plates from GSC2.3 were carried out with different methods, such as Global, Mask and Filter. The results indicate that a 7th-order polynomial is sufficient to account for the influence of Schmidt plate deformation on the measured coordinates of stars. The magnitude equation can be eliminated after correcting for a common magnitude equation. The RMS of the re-calibrated data is around ±0.2~0.3 arcsec.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Zacharias, , et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 3043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffrey, R. P., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 1559Google Scholar
Dick, W. R., et al. 1991, AN, 312, 113, 120Google Scholar
Bucciarelli, B., et al. 2008, this volume, p. 316Google Scholar