Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:21:38.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radio counterparts of gamma-ray pulsars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2013

L. Guillemot
L. Guillemot*
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Observations of pulsars with the Large Area Telescope (LAT) on the Fermi satellite have revolutionized our view of the gamma-ray pulsar population. For the first time, a large number of young gamma-ray pulsars have been discovered in blind searches of the LAT data. More generally, the LAT has discovered many new gamma-ray sources whose properties suggest that they are powered by unknown pulsars. Radio observations of gamma-ray sources have been key to the success of pulsar studies with the LAT. For example, radio observations of LAT-discovered pulsars provide constraints on the relative beaming fractions, which are crucial for pulsar population studies. Also, radio searches of LAT sources with no known counterparts have been very efficient, with the discovery of over forty millisecond pulsars. I review radio follow-up studies of LAT-discovered pulsars and unidentified sources, and discuss some of the implications of the results.

Keywords

pulsars: generalgamma rays: observations
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S291: Neutron Stars and Pulsars: Challenges and Opportunities after 80 years , August 2012 , pp. 87 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al. 2009, Science, 325, 840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 711, 64Google Scholar
Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., Allafort, A., et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camilo, F., Ray, P. S., Ransom, S. M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 705, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camilo, F., Kerr, M., Ray, P. S., et al. 2012, ApJ, 746, 39Google Scholar
Champion, D. J., McLaughlin, M. A., & Lorimer, D. R. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1011Google Scholar
Cordes, J. M. & Lazio, T. J. W. 2002, arXiv:0207156Google Scholar
Crawford, F., Roberts, M. S. E., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1499Google Scholar
Guillemot, L., Freire, P. C. C., Cognard, I., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 1294Google Scholar
Kataoka, J., Yatsu, Y., Kawai, N., et al. 2012, ApJ, 757, 176Google Scholar
Keith, M. J., Johnston, S., Ray, P. S., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 1292Google Scholar
Kong, A. K. H., Huang, R. H. H., Cheng, K. S., et al. 2012, ApJL, 747, 3Google Scholar
Lee, K. J., Guillemot, L., Yue, Y. L., Kramer, M., & Champion, D. J. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 2832Google Scholar
Maan, Y., Aswathappa, H. A., & Deshpande, A. A. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 2Google Scholar
Manchester, , Hobbs, , Teoh, , & Hobbs, 2005, AJ, 129, 1993Google Scholar
Nolan, P. L., Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., et al. 2012, ApJS, 199, 31Google Scholar
Pletsch, H. J., Guillemot, L., Allen, B., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 105Google Scholar
Pletsch, H. J., Guillemot, L., Allen, B., et al. 2012, ApJL, 755, 20Google Scholar
Ransom, S. M., Ray, P. S., Camilo, F., et al. 2011, ApJL, 727, 16Google Scholar
Ravi, V., Manchester, R. N., & Hobbs, G. 2010, ApJL, 716, 85Google Scholar
Ray, P. S., Kerr, M., Parent, D., et al. 2011, ApJS, 194, 17Google Scholar
Ray, P. S., Abdo, A. A., Parent, D., et al. 2012, Proc. of the 2011 Fermi Symp., arXiv:1205.3089Google Scholar
Roberts, M. S. E. 2011, Proc. of Pulsar Conference 2010, 1357, 127Google Scholar
Romani, R. W. 2011, ApJL, 743, 26Google Scholar
Romani, R. W. 2012, ApJL, 754, 25Google Scholar
Saz Parkinson, P. M., Dormody, M., Ziegler, M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 571Google Scholar
Saz Parkinson, P. M. 2011, Proc. of Pulsar Conference 2010, arXiv:1101.3096Google Scholar
Smith, D. A., Guillemot, L., Camilo, F., et al. 2008, A&A, 492, 923Google Scholar
Thompson, D. J. 2001, AIPC, 558, 103Google Scholar