Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:10:43.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quasar evolution: black hole mass and accretion rate determination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Deborah Dultzin-Hacyan
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía, UNAM, Apdo. Postal 70-264, 04510 Mexico D.F., Mexico email: [email protected]
Paola Marziani
Affiliation:
INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, [email protected]
C. Alenka Negrete
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía, UNAM, Apdo. Postal 70-264, 04510 Mexico D.F., Mexico email: [email protected]
Jack W. Sulentic
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Accurate measurements of emission line properties are crucial to understand the physics of the broad line region in quasars. This region consists of warm gas that is closest to the quasar central engine and has not been spatially resolved for almost all sources. We present here an analysis of optical and IR data for a large sample of quasars, covering the Hi Hβ spectral region in the redshift range 0 ≲ z ≲ 2.5. Spectra were interpreted within the framework of the the so-called “eigenvector 1” parameter space, which can be viewed as a tentative H-R diagram for quasars. We stress the lack of spectral evolution in the low ionization lines of quasars, with prominent Fe ii emission also at z ≳ 2. We also show how selection effects influence the ability to find quasars radiating at low Eddington ratio in flux-limited surveys. The quasar similarity at different redshift is probably due to the absence of super-Eddington radiators (at least within the caveats of black hole mass and Eddington ratio determination discussed in this paper) as well as to the limited Eddington ratio range within which quasars seem to radiate.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Bernardi, M., Sheth, R. K., Nichol, R. C., Schneider, D. P. & Brinkmann, J. 2005, AJ, 129, 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collin, S., Kawaguchi, T., Peterson, B. M. & Vestergaard, M. 2006, A&A, 456, 75Google Scholar
Kaspi, S., Maoz, D., Netzer, H., Peterson, B. M., Vestergaard, M. & Jannuzi, B. T. 2005, ApJ, 629, 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marziani, P., Dultzin-Hacyan, D. & Sulentic, J. W. 2006, astro-ph/0606678Google Scholar
Marziani, P., Zamanov, R. K., Sulentic, J. W. & Calvani, M. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, B. M. et al. 2002, ApJ, 581, 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, B. M. et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulentic, J. W., Repetto, P., Stirpe, G. M., Marziani, P., Dultzin-Hacyan, D. & Calvani, M. 2006, A&A, 456, 929Google Scholar
Sulentic, J. W., Stirpe, G. M., Marziani, P., Zamanov, R., Calvani, M. & Braito, V. 2004, A&A, 423, 121Google Scholar
Vestergaard, M., Peterson, B. M. 2006, ApJ, 641, 689CrossRefGoogle Scholar