Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:42:03.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PSR J1906+0746: From relativistic spin-precession to beam modeling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2013

Gregory Desvignes
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel, 69 D-53121 Bonn, Germany email: [email protected]
Michael Kramer
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel, 69 D-53121 Bonn, Germany email: [email protected]
Ismaël Cognard
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physique et Chimie de l'Environnement et de l'Espace, 3A Avenue de la Recherche Scientifique, 45071 Orléans cedex 2, France
Laura Kasian
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
Joeri van Leeuwen
Affiliation:
ASTRON, the Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy, Postbus 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo, The Netherlands
Ingrid Stairs
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
Gilles Theureau
Affiliation:
Station de radioastronomie de Nançay, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS/INSU, 18330 Nançay, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Shortly after the discovery of PSR J1906+0746, some hints of profile variations were already interpreted as first signs of relativistic spin-precession occuring. Using observations from the Nançay, Arecibo and Green Bank Radio Observatories, we report here the measurement of pulse profile and polarimetric variations. Using the Rotating Vector Model, we show that PSR J1906+0746 is likely to be an orthogonal rotator (α ≃ 80°). Fitting our polarimetric data to a precession model, we determined the geometry of the pulsar and found a wide misalignment angle (δ = 89−44+85 deg, 95% C.L.), although the uncertainty is large. Assuming this geometry, we constructed the beam maps of both magnetic poles.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Barker, B. M. & O'Connell, R. F. 1975, ApJ, 199, L25Google Scholar
Damour, T. & Ruffini, R. 1974, Academie des Sciences Paris Comptes Rendus Serie Sciences Mathematiques 279 971973Google Scholar
Desvignes, G. 2009, Thèse de doctorat, Université d'OrléansGoogle Scholar
Kasian, L. 2008, American Institute of Physics Conference Series, 983Google Scholar
Kasian, L. 2012, PhD thesis, University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. & Wex, N. 2009, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 26, 073001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorimer, D. & Kramer, M. 2005, Handbook of Pulsar AstronomyGoogle Scholar
Lorimer, D. R. & Stairs, I. H. and Freire, P. C. C.et al. 2006, ApJ 640 428434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyne, A., Hobbs, G. & Kramer, et al. 2010, Science 329 408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester, R. N., Kramer, M., Stairs, I. H.et al. 2010, ApJ 710 16941709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radhakrishnan, V. & Cooke, D. J. 1969, ApL 3 225229Google Scholar