Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:02:12.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proposal for Multi-Messenger Observations of Radio Transients by Nasu and Ligo-Virgo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

Kazuhiro Hayama ,
Kotaro Niinuma  and
Tomoaki Oyama
Kazuhiro Hayama
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik, D-30167 Hannover, Germany email: [email protected] National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan
Kotaro Niinuma
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 753-8511, Japan
Tomoaki Oyama
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The gravitational waves radiated from explosions of compact objects are expected to be accompanied by other astronomical radiation such as radio flares, neutrinos and gamma-rays. In order to improve the detection of gravitational waves, mutual follow-up observations have been proposed between gravitational wave telescopes and other astronomical telescopes, known as “multi-messenger” observations. We propose multi-messenger observations using the LIGO, Virgo and Nasu Radio Telescopes.

Keywords

multi-messengergravitational wavesradio transients
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 7 , Symposium S285: New Horizons in Time-Domain Astronomy , September 2011 , pp. 331 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Abadie, J., et al. (2011), Physical Review D, 82, 102001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, B. P., et al. (2009a), Reports on Progress in Physics, 72, 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, B. P., et al. (2009b), Physical Review D, 80, 062001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, B. P., et al. (2009c), Physical Review D, 80, 062002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, B. P., et al. (2010a), ApJ, 715, 1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, B. P., et al. (2010b), ApJ, 715, 1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accadia, T., et al. (2011), Classical and Quantum Gravity, 28, 11Google Scholar
Daishido, T., et al. (2000), Proc. SPIE, 4015, 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B. M. S., et al. (2001), Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 322, 695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kida, S., et al. (2008), New Astronomy, 13, 519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuniyoshi, M., et al. (2006), PASP, 118, 901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuniyoshi, M., et al. (2007), PASP, 119, 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakajima, J., et al. (1993), PASJ, 45, 477Google Scholar
Nakar, E. & Piran, T. (2011), Nature, 478, 82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niinuma, K., et al. (2007), PASP, 119, 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niinuma, K., et al. (2007), ApJ, 657, L37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niinuma, K., et al. (2009), ApJ, 704, 652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otobe, E., et al. (1994), PASJ, 46, 503Google Scholar
Takefuji, K., et al. (2007), PASP, 119, 1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeuchi, H., et al. (2005), PASJ, 57, 815CrossRefGoogle Scholar