Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:51:43.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Properties of star forming regions in the Magellanic Clouds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

Mónica Rubio*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Understanding the process of star formation in low metallicity systems is one of the key studies in the early stages of galaxy evolution. The Magellanic Clouds, being the nearest examples of low metallicity systems, allow us to study in detail their star forming regions. As a consequence of their proximity we can resolve the molecular clouds and the regions of star formation individually. Therefore we can increase our knowledge of the interaction of young luminous stars with their environment. We will present results of multiwavelenghts studies of LMC and SMC massive star forming regions, which includes properties of the cold molecular gas, the embedded young population associated with molecular clouds, and the interaction of newly born stars with the surrounding interstellar medium, based on ASTE and APEX submillimeter observations complemented high sensitivity NIR groud based observations and Spitzer results.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2009

References

Barbá, R. H., Rubio, M., Roth, M, et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 1940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bik, A., Kaper, L., Waters, L. B. F. M., et al. 2006, A&A, 455, 561Google Scholar
Bloemen, J. B. G. M., Strong, A. W., Mayer-Hasselwander, H. A., et al. 1986, A&A, 154, 25Google Scholar
Bolatto, A. D., Simon, J. D., Stanimirović, S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 655, 212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolatto, A, Leroy, A., Rosolowsky, E., et al. 2008, ApJ, 686, 948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bot, C., Boulanger, F., Lagache, G., Cambrésy, L., & Egret, D. 2004, A&A, 423, 567Google Scholar
Bot, C, Boulanger, F., Rubio, M., & Rantakyrö, F. 2006, A&A, 471, 103Google Scholar
Brandner, W., Grebel, E., Barbá, R., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, R. S, Dame, T. M, Garay, G., et al. 1988, ApJ, 331, L95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contursi, A., Lequeux, J., Cesarsky, D., et al. 2000, A&A, 362, 310Google Scholar
Contursi, A, Rubio, M., Sauvage, M., et al. 2007, A&A, 469, 539Google Scholar
Davies, R. D., Elliot, K. H., & Meaburn, J. 1976, MemRAS, 81, 89Google Scholar
Dupac, X., del Burgo, C., Bernard, J.-P., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, Y, Mizuno, N., Yamaguchi, R., et al. 1999, PASJ, 51, 745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, Y, Kawamura, A., Minamidani, T., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galliano, F., Madden, S. C., Jones, A. P., Wilson, C. D., Bernard, J.-P., & Le Peintre, F. 2003, A&A, 407, 159Google Scholar
Galliano, F., Madden, S. C., Jones, A. P., Wilson, C. D., & Bernard, J.-P. 2005, A&A, 434, 867Google Scholar
Gouliermis, D., Brandner, W., & Henning, Th. 2006, ApJ, 636, L133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouliermis, D. A., Chu, Y.-H., Henning, Th., et al. 2008, ApJ, arXiv:0710.1352Google Scholar
Gruendl, R. A., Chu, Y., et al. 2008, submittedGoogle Scholar
Henize, K. H. 1956, ApJS, 2, 315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, F. P., Johansson, L. E. B., Lequeux, J., et al. 1993, A&A, 276, 25Google Scholar
Jones, T. J., Woodward, C. E., Boyer, M. L., et al. 2005, ApJ, 620, 731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, R. B. 1981, MNRAS, 194, 809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lequeux, J., Le Bourlot, J., Pineau Des Forêts, G., Roueff, E., Boulanger, F., & Rubio, M. 1994, A&A, 292, 371Google Scholar
Leroy, A., Bolatto, A., Stanimirović, S., Mizuno, N., Israel, F., & Bot, C. 2007, ApJ, 658, 1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, P. 2002, ApJS, 141, 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meixner, M., Gordon, K., Indebetouw, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 133, 2268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizuno, N, Rubio, M., Mizuno, A., Yamaguchi, R., Onishi, T., & Fukui, Y. 2001, PASJ, 53, 971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizuno, N., Muller, E., Maeda, H., et al. 2006, ApJ, 643, 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishiyama, S., Haba, Y., Kato, D., et al. 2007, ApJ, 658, 358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nota, A., Sirianni, M., Sabbi, E., et al. 2006, ApJ, 640, L29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, J. M., van Loon, J. Th., Stanimirović, S., & Zijlstra, A.A. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 75Google Scholar
Perez, L. 2005, MSc thesis, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, ChileGoogle Scholar
Reach, W. T., Boulanger, F., Contursi, A, et al. 2000, A&A, 361, 895Google Scholar
Rubio, M., Garay, G, Montani, J., et al. 1991, ApJ, 368, 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubio, M., Lequeux, J., Boulanger, F., et al. 1993, A&A, 271, 1Google Scholar
Rubio, M., Barbá, R. H., Walborn, N., et al. 1998, AJ 116, 1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubio, M., Contursi, A., Lequeux, J., et al. 2000, A&A, 359, 1139Google Scholar
Rubio, M., Boulanger, F., Rantakyrö, F., & Contursi, A., 2004, A&A, 425, L1Google Scholar
Rubio, M. 2007, in Elmegreen, B. G. & Palouš, J. (eds.), Triggered star formation in a turbulent ISM, IAU Conf.Proc. 237 (Cambridge: CUP), p. 40Google Scholar
Rubio, M., & Barbá, R. H. 2008, ApJL, submittedGoogle Scholar
Rubio, M., Paron, S., & Dubner, G. 2008, A&A, submittedGoogle Scholar
Sabbi, E., Siriani, M, Nota, A., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, J. D., Bolatto, A. D., Whitney, B. A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 669, 327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, P. M., Rivolo, A. R., Barrett, J., & Yahil, A. 1987, ApJ, 319, 730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walborn, N. R., Barbá, R. H., Brandner, W., et al. 1999, AJ, 117, 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingartner, J. C., & Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJ, 548, 296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, B. A., Sewilo, M., Indebetouw, R., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, R., Mizuno, N., Mizuno, A., et al. 2001, PASJ, 53, 985CrossRefGoogle Scholar