Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:12:56.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Promise of Recent and Future Observatories and Instruments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2014

L Kaper
L Kaper*
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute Anton Pannekoek, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, the Netherlands email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The identification of the carrier(s) of diffuse interstellar bands (DIBs) is one of the oldest mysteries in stellar spectroscopy. With the advent of 8-10m-class telescopes substantial progress has been made in measuring the properties of DIBs in the optical and near-infrared wavelength domain, not only in the Galaxy, but also in different environments encountered in Local Group galaxies and beyond. Still, the DIB carriers have remained unidentified. The coming decade will witness the development of extremely large telescopes (GMT, TMT and E-ELT) and their instrumentation. In this overview I will highlight the current instrumentation plan of these future observatories, emphasizing their potential role in solving the enigma of the DIBs.

Keywords

Instrumentation: spectrographsStars: early-typeGalaxies: Local Group
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Symposium S297: The Diffuse Interstellar Bands , May 2013 , pp. 389 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Bresolin, F. & Kudritzki, R. P. 2013, in proc. IAU Symp. 289, p. 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordiner, M. A., Smith, K. T., Cox, N. L. J., et al. 2008, A&A, 492, L5Google Scholar
Cordiner, M. A., Cox, N. L. J., Evans, C. J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 726, 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, N. L. J., Kaper, L., Foing, B. H., & Ehrenfreund, P. 2005, A&A 438, 187Google Scholar
Cox, N. L. J., Cordiner, M. A., Cami, J., et al. 2006, A&A 447, 991Google Scholar
Cox, N. L. J., Boudin, N., Foing, B. H., et al. 2007a, A&A 465, 899Google Scholar
Cox, N. L. J., Kaper, L., Ehrenfreund, P., et al. 2007b, A&A 470, 941Google Scholar
Cox, N. L. J. & Patat, N. 2008, A&A 485, 9Google Scholar
Ehrenfreund, P., Cami, J., Jiménez-Vicente, J., et al. 2002, ApJ (Letters), 576, 117Google Scholar
Ellerbroek, L. E., Kaper, L., Bik, A., et al. 2011, ApJ (Letters), 732, L9Google Scholar
Ellerbroek, L. E., Bik, A., Kaper, L., et al. 2013, A&A, in pressGoogle Scholar
Ellison, S. L., York, B. A., Murphy, M. T., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 383, L30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C., Puech, M., Barbuy, B., et al. 2013, arXiv, 1303.0029Google Scholar
Fynbo, J. P. U., Jakobsson, P., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2009, ApJS, 185, 526Google Scholar
Hartoog, O. E., Sana, H., De Koter, A., & Kaper, L. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 367Google Scholar
Heckmann, T. M. & Lehnert, M. D. 2000, ApJ, 537, 690Google Scholar
Heger, M. L. 1922, Lick Obs. Bulletin 10 337, 146Google Scholar
Herbig, G. 1975, ApJ, 196, 129Google Scholar
Herbig, G. H. 1995, ARAA, 33, 19Google Scholar
Hobbs, L. M., York, D. G., Thorburn, J. A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 705, 32Google Scholar
Geballe, T. R., Najarro, F., Figer, D. F., et al. 2011, Nature, 479, 200Google Scholar
Jacoby, G. H., Bouchez, A., Colless, M., et al. 2012, SPIE, 8446E, 1GJGoogle Scholar
Junkkarinen, V. T., Cohen, R. D., Beaver, E. A., et al. 2004, ApJ, 614, 658Google Scholar
Kaper, L., Ellerbroek, L. E., Ochsendorf, B. B., et al. 2011, AN, 332, 232Google Scholar
Krühler, T., Ledoux, C., Fynbo, J. P. U., et al. 2013, ApJ, in pressGoogle Scholar
Lawton, B., Churchill, C. W., York, B. A., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 994Google Scholar
Noterdaeme, P., Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P., & Srianand, R. 2008, A&A, 481, 327Google Scholar
Ochsendorf, B. B., Ellerbroek, L. E., Chini, R., et al. 2011, A&A (Letters), 536, L1Google Scholar
Pepe, F. A., Cristiani, S., Rebolo Lopez, R., et al. 2010, SPIE, 7735E, 14PGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, S., D'Odorico, S., Casali, M., et al. 2010, SPIE, 7735E, 71RGoogle Scholar
Sarre, P. J. 2006, Journal of Mol. Spectr. 238, 1Google Scholar
Simard, L., Crampton, D., Ellerbroek, B., & Boyer, C. 2010, SPIE, 7735E, 70SGoogle Scholar
Snow, T. P. 2002, in proc. 17th IAP Astroph. Coll. June 2001 ParisGoogle Scholar
Sollerman, J., Cox, N. L. J., Matilla, S., et al. 2005, A&A, 429, 559Google Scholar
Strassmeier, K. G., Woche, M., Ilyin, I., et al. 2008, SPIE, 7014E, 21SGoogle Scholar
Tanvir, N. R., Fox, D. B., Levan, A. J., et al. 2009, Nature, 461, 1254Google Scholar
Thoöne, C. C., Michalowski, M. J., Leloudas, G., et al. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1307Google Scholar
Tramper, F., Sana, H., De Koter, A., & Kaper, L. 2011, ApJ (Letters), 741, L8Google Scholar
Tuairisg, S. O., Cami, J., Foing, B. H., et al. 2000, A&AS, 142, 225Google Scholar
VanLoon, J. T. h. Loon, J. T. h., Smith, K. T., McDonald, I., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 195Google Scholar
Van Loon, J. T. h., Baily, M., Tatton, B. L., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, 108Google Scholar
Van Paradijs, J. A., Groot, P. M., Galama, T., et al. 1997, Nature, 386, 686Google Scholar
Vernet, J., Dekker, H., D'Odorico, S., et al. 2011, A&A, 536, 105Google Scholar
Vladilo, G., Crivellari, L., Molaro, P., & Beckman, J. E. 1987, A&A, 182, L59Google Scholar
Vos, D. A. I., Cox, N. L. J., Kaper, L., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, 129Google Scholar
Welty, D., Federman, S., Gredel, R, et al. 2006, ApJS, 165, 138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
York, B. A., Ellison, S. L., Lawton, B., et al. 2006, ApJ (Letters), 647, L29Google Scholar
Zafar, T., Watson, D., Elíasdóttir, , et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 82Google Scholar
Zoomers, H. 2008, in Louwman Collection of Historical Telescopes, Ed. Zuidervaart, H., ISBN 978-90-79817-01-6Google Scholar