Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:54:02.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Promise of Multiwavelength and IFU Observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Robert C. Kennicutt Jr.
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK
Cai-Na Hao
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK
Benjamin D. Johnson
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK
Fabian Rosales-Ortega
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK
Angeles Díaz
Affiliation:
Departamento de Física Teórica, C-XI, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Anna Pasquale
Affiliation:
Max-Planck Institute für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Sebastian F. Sánchez
Affiliation:
Centro Astronómico Hispano Alemám, Calar Alto, CSIC-MPG, Jesús Durbán Remón 2, E-04004, Almeria, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many of the advances of the last decade in this subject have been the result of large spectroscopic surveys of galaxies on the one hand, and multi-wavelength surveys of galaxies on the other. This talk highlights applications that exploit a combination of spectroscopic and multi-wavelength diagnostics. Most applications to date have been based on spatially integrated measurements of galaxies, but the introduction of wide-field integral field spectrometers promises to extend ths approach to spatially-resolved analyses of galaxies.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Blanc, G. A., Heiderman, A., Gebhardt, K., Evans, N. J., & Adams, J. 2009, ApJ 704, 842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS 344, 1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buat, V. et al. 2005, ApJ (Letters) 619, L51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmunds, M. G. & Pagel, B. E. J. 1984, MNRAS 211, 507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, C.-N. et al. 2009, in preparationGoogle Scholar
Kelz, A. et al. 2006, PASP 118, 129Google Scholar
Kewley, L. J., Geller, M. J., Jansen, R. A., & Dopita, M. A. 2002, AJ, 124, 3135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. D. et al. 2007a, ApJS, 173, 377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. D. et al. 2007b, ApJS, 173, 392Google Scholar
Johnson, B. D. et al. 2009, in preparationGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. 1988, ARAA 36, 189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. et al. 2003, PASP 115, 98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. et al. 2009, ApJ 703, 1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, X., Charlot, S., Brinchmann, J., & Fall, S. M. 2004, MNRAS 349, 769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meurer, G. R., Heckman, T. M., & Calzetti, D. 1999, ApJ 521, 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moustakas, J. & Kennicutt, R. C. 2006, ApJS, 164, 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettini, M. & Pagel, B. E. J. 2004, MNRAS 348, L59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosales-Ortega, F. 2009, PhD thesis, Univ CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Rosales-Ortega, F., Kennicutt, R. C., Sánchez, S. F., Díaz, A. I., Pasquali, A., Johnson, B. D., & Hao, C. N. 2009, MNRAS, submittedGoogle Scholar