Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:29:37.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Progenitors of electron-capture supernovae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Samuel Jones
Affiliation:
Astrophysics Group, Lennard Jones Building, Keele University ST5 5BG, UK email: [email protected]
Raphael Hirschi
Affiliation:
Astrophysics Group, Lennard Jones Building, Keele University ST5 5BG, UK Kavli IPMU, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan
Falk Herwig
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Victoria, BC V8W 3P6, Canada
Bill Paxton
Affiliation:
KITP and Dept. of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106USA
Francis X. Timmes
Affiliation:
Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, University of Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA School of Earth and Space Exploration, University of Arizona, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
Ken'ichi Nomoto
Affiliation:
Kavli IPMU, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We investigate the lowest mass stars that produce Type-II supernovae, motivated by recent results showing that a large fraction of type-II supernova progenitors for which there are direct detections display unexpectedly low luminosity (for a review see e.g. Smartt 2009). There are three potential evolutionary channels leading to this fate. Alongside the standard ‘massive star’ Fe-core collapse scenario we investigate the likelihood of electron capture supernovae (EC-SNe) from super-AGB (S-AGB) stars in their thermal pulse phase, from failed massive stars for which neon burning and other advanced burning stages fail to prevent the star from contracting to the critical densities required to initiate rapid electron-capture reactions and thus the star's collapse. We find it indeed possible that both of these relatively exotic evolutionary channels may be realised but it is currently unclear for what proportion of stars. Ultimately, the supernova light curves, explosion energies, remnant properties (see e.g. Knigge et al. 2011) and ejecta composition are the quantities desired to establish the role that these stars at the lower edge of the massive star mass range play.

Type
Poster Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Gutierrez, J., Garcia-Berro, E., & Iben, Jr. et al. 1996, ApJ, 459, 701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knigge, C., Coe, M. J., & Podsiadlowski, P. 2011, Nature, 479, 372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyaji, S. & Nomoto, K. 1987, ApJ, 318, 307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomoto, K. 1984, ApJ, 277, 791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., Herwig, F., Lesaffre, P., & Timmes, F. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smartt, S. J. 2009, ARAA, 47, 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar