Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:48:25.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Problems of Clustering of Radiogalaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2013

Włodzimierz Godłowski
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Opole University, Oleska 48, 45-052 Opole, Poland email: [email protected]
Agnieszka Pollo
Affiliation:
Astronomical Observatory, Jagellonian University, Orla 171, 30-244 Krakow, Poland National Centre for Nuclear Research, Hoza 69, 00-689 Warszawa email: [email protected]
Jacek Golbiak
Affiliation:
Institute of Philosophy of Nature and Natural Sciences, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Al. Racawickie 14, 20-950 Lublin, Poland email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present the preliminary analysis of clustering of a sample of 1157 radio-identified galaxies from Machalski & Condon (1999). We found that for separations 2–15 h−1 Mpc their redshift space autocorrelation function ξ(s) can be approximated by the power law with the correlation length ~3.75h−1 Mpc and slope γ ~ 1.8. The correlation length for radiogalaxies is found to be lower and the slope steeper than the corresponding parameters of the control sample of optically observed galaxies. Analysis the projected correlation function Ξ(r) displays possible differences in the clustering properties between active galactic nuclei (AGN) and starburst (SB) galaxies.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Condon, J. J., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machalski, J. & Condon, J. J. 1999, ApJS, 123, 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, J. A. & Nicholson, D. 1991, MNRAS, 253, 307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, J. A. in “The Most Distant Radio Galaxies” & Amsterdam, 1997, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, eds Rttgering, H. J. A., et al. 1999, p. 377.Google Scholar
Shectman, S. A, et al. 1996, ApJ, 470, 172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, D. L., et al. 1997, MNRAS, 285, L5CrossRefGoogle Scholar