Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:51:45.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A prediction of the solar cycle 25

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2018

Jie Jiang
Affiliation:
School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing, China email: [email protected]
Jing-Xiu Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Qi-Rong Jiao
Affiliation:
School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing, China email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Here we report our recent prediction of the solar cycle 25 based on a newly developed scheme, which is used to investigate the predictability of the solar cycle over one cycle. The scheme is a combination of the empirical properties of solar cycles and a surface flux transport model to get the possible axial dipole moment evolution at a few years before cycle minimum, by which to get the subsequent cycle strength based on the correlation between the axial dipole moment at cycle minimum and the subsequent cycle strength. We apply this scheme to predict the large-scale field evolution since 2018 onwards. The results show that the northern polar field will keep on increasing, while the southern polar field almost keeps flat by the end of cycle 24. This leads to the cycle 25 strength of 125 ± 32, which is about 10% stronger than cycle 24 according to the mean value.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Cameron, R. H., Jiang, J., & Schüssler, M., 2016, ApJL, 823, L22Google Scholar
Hathaway, D. H., Wilson, R. M., & Reichmann, E. J., 1994, Sol. Phys., 151, 177Google Scholar
Hazra, G., Karak, B. B., Banerjee, D., & Choudhuri, A. R., 2015, Sol. Phys., 290, 1851Google Scholar
Jiang, J., Chatterjee, P., & Choudhuri, A. R., 2007, MNRAS, 381, 1527Google Scholar
Jiang, J., Cameron, R. H., & Schüssler, M., 2014, ApJ, 791, 5Google Scholar
Jiang, J., Cameron, R. H., & Schüssler, M., 2015, ApJL, 808, L28Google Scholar