Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T08:59:49.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Precision Calibration for HERA and 21 cm Cosmology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2018

Joshua S. Dillon Open the ORCID record for Joshua S. Dillon [Opens in a new window]
Joshua S. Dillon*
Affiliation:
NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Here I discuss progress in both the theory and practice of data analysis for the Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array (HERA), focusing on techniques to calibrate the instrumental response and preserve the spectral smoothness that is essential to separating the cosmological 21 cm signal from foregrounds that are five orders of magnitude brighter. I explain how mis-calibration can create ruinous spectral structure and how we take advantage of HERA’s highly-redundant configuration for calibration. This proceeding draws from a talk I gave on October 3, 2017. Slides for it and all my talks are available at joshdillon.net.

Keywords

cosmology: dark agesreionizationfirst stars – instrumentation: interferometers
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 12 , Symposium S333: Peering towards Cosmic Dawn , October 2017 , pp. 114 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Ali, Z. S. et al. PAPER-64 Constraints on Reionization: The 21 cm Power Spectrum at z = 8.4. ApJ, 809: 61, August 2015.Google Scholar
Barry, N., Hazelton, B., Sullivan, I., Morales, M.F. and Pober, J.C. Calibration requirements for detecting the 21 cm epoch of reionization power spectrum and implications for the SKA. MNRAS, 461: 3135–3144, September 2016.Google Scholar
Braun, R. Understanding synthesis imaging dynamic range. A&A, 551: A91, March 2013.Google Scholar
DeBoer, D. R. et al. Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array (HERA). ArXiv e-prints, June 2016.Google Scholar
Dillon, J.S. and Parsons, A.R. Interferometric bandpass calibration with redundant baselines.Google Scholar
Dillon, J.S. and Parsons, A.R. Redundant Array Configurations for 21 cm Cosmology. ApJ, 826: 181, August 2016.Google Scholar
Ewall-Wice, A., Dillon, J.S., Liu, A. and Hewitt, J. The Impact of Modeling Errors on Interferometer Calibration for 21 cm Power Spectra. ArXiv e-prints, October 2016.Google Scholar
Furlanetto, S.R., Oh, S.P. and Briggs, F.H. Cosmology at low frequencies: The 21 cm transition and the high-redshift Universe. Phys. Rep., 433: 181–301, October 2006.Google Scholar
Liu, A., Tegmark, M., Morrison, S., Lutomirski, A. and Zaldarriaga, M. Precision calibration of radio interferometers using redundant baselines. MNRAS, 408: 1029–1050, October 2010.Google Scholar
Liu, A., Parsons, A.R. and Trott, C.M. Epoch of reionization window. I. Mathematical formalism. Phys. Rev. D, 90 (2): 023018, July 2014.Google Scholar
Morales, M.F. and Wyithe, J.S.B. Reionization and Cosmology with 21-cm Fluctuations. ARA&A, 48: 127–171, September 2010.Google Scholar
Orosz, N., Dillon, J.S., Ewall-Wice, A. and Parsons, A.R. Mitigating the effect of antenna position errors and beam variations on redundant-baseline calibration.Google Scholar
Yatawatta, S. Fine tuning consensus optimization for distributed radio interferometric calibration. ArXiv e-prints, May 2016.Google Scholar
Zheng, H. et al. MITEoR: a scalable interferometer for precision 21 cm cosmology. MNRAS, 445: 1084–1103, December 2014.Google Scholar