Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:33:38.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Possible connection between P Cygni and neighboring open clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Sopia Beradze
Affiliation:
Abastumani Astrophysical Observatory, Ilia State University Samtskhe-Javakheti State University
Nino Kochiashvili
Affiliation:
Abastumani Astrophysical Observatory, Ilia State University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

According to earlier investigations by Turner and co-authors, P Cygni could be a member of a hypothetical, sparsely populated open cluster. The star lies near the east boundary of this hypothetical cluster. There is another known open cluster, IC 4996, in the vicinity of P Cygni. The same authors believe that the above mentioned two clusters are connected to each other and they could represent a double cluster. As P Cygni is a hypergiant and consequently has very strong and variable stellar wind, so a cluster membership can enable us to determine the age, distance, and reddening of the star relatively precisely. We used new data of different catalogues, for example, PPMXL and Gaia and tried to resolve the problem.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Balaguer-Nunez, L., Galadi-Enriquez, D., Lopez del Fresno, M., Solano, E., Jordi, C., Sezima, T., & Paunzen, E. 2017, 2017 hsa9.conf, 328Google Scholar
Beals, C. S. 1930, JRASC, 24, 277Google Scholar
Beals, C. S. 1932, MNRAS, 92, 677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beals, C. S. 1934, Obs, 57, 31Google Scholar
Conti Peter, S. 1984, IAUS, 105, 233Google Scholar
de Jager, C. & Israelian, G. 2003, New Astron, 8, 5, 475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, M. 1988. IrAJ, 18, 163Google Scholar
de Groot, M. 1969, CoKon, 65, 203Google Scholar
de Groot, M., Sterken, C., & van Genderen, A. M 2001, ASPC, 233, 15Google Scholar
Kashi, Amit 2010, MNRAS, 3, 1924Google Scholar
Kochiashvili, N., Beradze, S., Natsvlishvili, R., Kochiashvili, I., Vardosanidze, M., & Pannicke, A. 2018, Ap, 61, 22Google Scholar
Michaelis, Amir M., Kashi, Amit, & Kochiashvili, Nino 2018, NewA, 3, 1924Google Scholar
McCrea, W. H. 1929, Obs, 52, 267Google Scholar
Najarro, F., Hillier, D. J., & Stahl, O. 1997, A&A, 326, 1117Google Scholar
Stahl, O. 1993, LNP, 416, 263Google Scholar
Straizys, V., Boyle, R. P., Milašius, K., černis, K., Macijauskas, M., Munari, U., Janusz, R., Zdanavičius, J., Zdanavičius, K., Maskoliōnas, M., Raudeliōnas, S., & Kazlauskas, A. 2019, A&A 623, A22Google Scholar
Turner, D. G., Welch, G., Graham, M., Fairweather, D., Horsford, A., Seymour, M., & Feibelman, W. 2001, JAVSO, 29, 73Google Scholar
Turner, D. G. 1985, A&A, 144, 241Google Scholar
van Genderen, A. M. 2001, A&A. 366, 508Google Scholar
van Genderen, A. M., Sterken, C., de Groot, M. J. H. 1997 A&AS 124, 517Google Scholar